From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32928736B6 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2015 05:52:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,503,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="701514359" Received: from bottazzini-thinkpad-t430 (HELO [10.218.98.32]) ([10.218.98.32]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2015 05:52:44 -0700 Message-ID: <1427892736.17257.8.camel@bottazzini-ThinkPad-T430> From: "Bottazzini, Bruno" To: Jussi Kukkonen Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:52:16 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1427320163-9262-1-git-send-email-bruno.bottazzini@intel.com> <1427320163-9262-5-git-send-email-bruno.bottazzini@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] systemd: v219 with stable fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:52:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Qua, 2015-04-01 at 13:16 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Hi, > > On 25 March 2015 at 23:49, Bruno Bottazzini wrote: > > Adding patches that fix bugs for 219 version. > > This will get the same consistency of the stable systemd 219 version. > > > > More details: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/log/?h=v219-stable > > Is the idea of these patches to reproduce 219-stable in oe-core? If > yes, wouldn't it be easier to use systemd-stable repo and just update > the SRCREV instead of error prone patching? Or maybe I'm missing > something here... > > - Jussi Hello Jussi, The previous patch was done in the way you said but, Khem Raj suggested that we should use it as patches. Copying and Pasting what he said: "Thats good, although we have to be open on stable branch to do SRCREV updates which we hardly do. We only backport fixed via master so I see this as pointless from that angle." Best Regards,