From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Migration v2 and related work for 4.6
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:03:38 +0100
Message-ID: <1427965418.4037.6.camel@citrix.com>
References: <551BD097.2030208@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <551BD097.2030208@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>, Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>, Hongyang Yang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 12:03 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I propose that the libxc series be accepted independently of the libxl
> series.

That is most likely a good idea IMHO.

What do you estimate the chances of the libxl bit being done for 4.6 to
be?

Is there an option of actually switching to the new libxc without
switching libxl and fixing libxl later, or would that be as much work as
just fixing libxl?

Ian.