From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753047AbbDGI3s (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 04:29:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:33969 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbbDGI3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 04:29:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1428395380.3152.23.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Why not build kernel with -O3 From: Mike Galbraith To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:29:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55238221.9070905@plexistor.com> References: <1428388995.3152.10.camel@gmail.com> <55238221.9070905@plexistor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 10:07 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > He did say optional. So I'd imagine it would be a Kconfig of its own. > So the default can be as today, but people that want to experiment > need not hack the source code. Anybody wanting to play with it will just twiddle the Makefile. Anyone too lazy to do that is likely lying on the couch watching cartoons or something, not building kernels :) -Mike