From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754815AbbDHTtz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:49:55 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60830 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753851AbbDHTtw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:49:52 -0400
Message-ID: <1428522581.11099.7.camel@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking: Simplify mutex and rwsem spinning code
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:49:41 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1428521960-5268-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com>
References: <1428521960-5268-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 12:39 -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> This patchset applies on top of tip.
> 
> Jason Low (2):
>   locking/mutex: Further refactor mutex_spin_on_owner()
>   locking/rwsem: Use a return variable in rwsem_spin_on_owner()
> 
>  kernel/locking/mutex.c      |   14 ++++----------
>  kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c |   25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Meh. Personally I wouldn't mid leaving these files alone for a change,
the code is already pretty readable imho. Of course its a matter of
taste, so I won't argue.

Thanks,
Davidlohr