From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Archiving Xen on ARM and PVOPS subprojects Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:37:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1429184235.25195.98.camel@citrix.com> References: <8499DCF7-067C-40FD-AB48-586D8F49254B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8499DCF7-067C-40FD-AB48-586D8F49254B@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Lars Kurth Cc: Sarah Conway , Stefano Stabellini , "" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 17:23 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html we would need to > perform an archivation review. In this case, the situation is quite > clear IMHO and I believe that we do not need to make an extensive > case, besides the one above. So my proposal would be to just have a > committer vote on these. I would be happy if committers and > maintainers listed in a), b) and > http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html were to just > reply with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread. +1 to exorcising Xen ARM PV, it's just confusing and dead. My personal inclination is also that the pvops project is "done" and I would vote +1, but I don't really think it is up to me. If formally I am needed to vote to get things done then I would vote with the majority side of David, Konrad & Boris (who I believe are the 3 current Linux maintainers). Ian.