From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Archiving Xen on ARM and PVOPS subprojects Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1429260411.25195.198.camel@citrix.com> References: <8499DCF7-067C-40FD-AB48-586D8F49254B@gmail.com> <1429184235.25195.98.camel@citrix.com> <20150416182539.GC7388@x230.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150416182539.GC7388@x230.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Lars Kurth , Sarah Conway , Stefano Stabellini , "" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 14:25 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:37:15PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 17:23 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html we would need to > > > perform an archivation review. In this case, the situation is quite > > > clear IMHO and I believe that we do not need to make an extensive > > > case, besides the one above. So my proposal would be to just have a > > > committer vote on these. I would be happy if committers and > > > maintainers listed in a), b) and > > > http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html were to just > > > reply with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread. > > > > +1 to exorcising Xen ARM PV, it's just confusing and dead. > > > > My personal inclination is also that the pvops project is "done" and I > > would vote +1, but I don't really think it is up to me. If formally I am > > needed to vote to get things done then I would vote with the majority > > side of David, Konrad & Boris (who I believe are the 3 current Linux > > maintainers). > > +1 for pvops and +1 for Xen ARM PV With Konrad and David's +1 for pvops my vote is no longer in doubt: +1. Ian.