All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
	nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in blkdev_reread_part()
Date: Wed,  6 May 2015 12:26:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430886389-26878-7-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430886389-26878-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

The only possible problem of using mutex_lock() instead of trylock
is about deadlock.

If there aren't any locks held before calling blkdev_reread_part(),
deadlock can't be caused by this conversion.

If there are locks held before calling blkdev_reread_part(),
and if these locks arn't required in open, close handler and I/O
path, deadlock shouldn't be caused too.

Both user space's ioctl(BLKRRPART) and md_setup_drive() from
init/do_mounts_md.c belongs to the 1st case, so the conversion is safe
for the two cases.

For loop, the previous patches in this pathset has fixed the ABBA lock
dependency, so the conversion is OK.

For nbd, tx_lock is held when calling the function:

	- both open and release won't hold the lock
	- when blkdev_reread_part() is run, I/O thread has been stopped
	already, so tx_lock won't be acquired in I/O path at that time.
	- so the conversion won't cause deadlock for nbd

For dasd, both dasd_open(), dasd_release() and request function don't
acquire any mutex/semphone, so the conversion should be safe.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
---
 block/ioctl.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index 203cb4a..8061eba 100644
--- a/block/ioctl.c
+++ b/block/ioctl.c
@@ -174,13 +174,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blkdev_reread_part);
  * This is an exported API for the block driver, and will
  * try to acquire bd_mutex. If bd_mutex has been held already
  * in current context, please call __blkdev_reread_part().
+ *
+ * Make sure the held locks in current context aren't required
+ * in open()/close() handler and I/O path for avoiding ABBA deadlock:
+ * - bd_mutex is held before calling block driver's open/close
+ *   handler
+ * - reading partition table may submit I/O to the block device
  */
 int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev)
 {
 	int res;
 
-	if (!mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex))
-		return -EBUSY;
+	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 	res = __blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
 	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-06  4:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] block: export blkdev_reread_part() and __blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Ming Lei
2015-05-06  4:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2015-05-06  4:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop Ming Lei
2015-05-18 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-20  9:17   ` Ming Lei
2015-05-20  9:17     ` Ming Lei
2015-05-20 15:03     ` Jens Axboe
2015-05-20 15:03       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1430886389-26878-7-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.