From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI fallback for shutdown Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1431443983.8263.179.camel@citrix.com> References: <1430989624-21654-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1430993516.2660.358.camel@citrix.com> <21842.5722.119507.912307@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21842.5722.119507.912307@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Jim Fehlig , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:03 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI fallback for shutdown"): > > If that were the case then I think the below would do the trick, but as > > I say I don't have an immediately convenient way to test, nor a need > > since there are no such tests right now. > > This patch looks plausible. Subject to comments from Jim I would be > tempted to throw it into osstest alongside the patch to do the same to > xl, with appropriate caveats in the commit message. Shall I fold it into the xl one, or do it separately?