From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: fix a potential deadlock in tcp_get_info() Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:56:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1432317396.4060.130.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20150521.232541.173137306546517818.davem@davemloft.net> <1432266206.4060.119.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1432270279.4060.128.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20150522.135042.1383929510137041615.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mleitner@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ycheng@google.com, mattmathis@google.com, cgallek@google.com, kafai@fb.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:38166 "EHLO mail-ig0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756992AbbEVR4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 13:56:38 -0400 Received: by igcau1 with SMTP id au1so38372617igc.1 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:56:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150522.135042.1383929510137041615.davem@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 13:50 -0400, David Miller wrote: > This bug exists in 'net' so I've applied it there. > > Thanks Eric. Oh thats right, sorry for this, as you'll probably have a conflict when merging net into net-next. Thanks.