From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753179AbbFSCuF (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:50:05 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:45569 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752593AbbFSCt4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:49:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1434682195.23771.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] ppc64 LE ABI v2 ftrace-with-regs implementation From: Michael Ellerman To: Torsten Duwe Cc: Steven Rostedt , Jiri Kosina , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:49:55 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20150618161727.GA6546@lst.de> References: <20150611095338.GA4492@lst.de> <20150618161727.GA6546@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 18:17 +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote: > Did I miss anything else? I have the notrace optimisations and > kernel live patching in the queue, which depends on this, so I'd > really appreciate a comment whether it is acceptable in this form > or not. Thanks in advance! Hi Torsten, Sorry I just haven't had time to look at it this week while I've been doing linux-next. I'll try and review it next week. There's no need to resend, we keep track of things in patchwork: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=2722 cheers