[PATCH i-g-t] Revert "tests/gem_ctx_param_basic: fix invalid params"

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] Revert "tests/gem_ctx_param_basic: fix invalid params"
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2015 23:33:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438896780-25788-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)

This reverts commit 0b45b0746f45deea11670a8b2c949776bbbef55c.

The point of testing for LAST_FLAG + 1 is to catch abi extensions -
despite our best efforts we really suck at properly reviewing for test
coverage when extending ABI.

The real bug here is that David Weinhall hasn't submitted updated igts
for the NO_ZEROMAP feature yet. Imo the right course of action is to
revert that feature if the testcase don't show up within a few days.

Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
index 5ff3b13f4c7a..b44b37cf0538 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ igt_main
 		ctx_param.size = 0;
 	}
 
-	ctx_param.param  = -1;
+	ctx_param.param  = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD + 1;
 
 	igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
 		ctx_param.context = ctx;
-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
