From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>, akuster808@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH][1.24/Dizzy] cooker: properly fix bitbake.lock handling
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:48:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440092897-6518-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the PR server or indeed any other child process takes some time to
exit (which it sometimes does when saving its database), it can end up
holding bitbake.lock after the UI exits, which led to errors if you ran
bitbake commands successively - we saw this when running the PR server
oe-selftest tests in OE-Core. The recent attempt to fix this wasn't
quite right and ended up breaking memory resident bitbake. This time we
close the lock file when cooker shuts down (inside the UI process)
instead of unlocking it, and this is done in the cooker code rather than
the actual UI code so it doesn't matter which UI is in use. Additionally
we report that we're waiting for the lock to be released, using lsof or
fuser if available to list the processes with the lock open.
The 'magic' in the locking is due to all spawned subprocesses of bitbake
holding an open file descriptor to the bitbake.lock. It is automatically
unlocked when all those fds close the file (as all the processes terminate).
We close the UI copy of the lock explicitly, then close the server process
copy, any remaining open copy is therefore some proess exiting.
(The reproducer for the problem is to set PRSERV_HOST = "localhost:0"
and add a call to time.sleep(20) after self.server_close() in
lib/prserv/serv.py, then run "bitbake -p; bitbake -p" ).
Cleanup work done by Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>.
This reverts bitbake commit 69ecd15aece54753154950c55d7af42f85ad8606 and
e97a9f1528d77503b5c93e48e3de9933fbb9f3cd.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
[sgw - merged changes from new main.py to bin/bitbake, dizzy will continue
to use bin/bitbake and not use the new main.py (which is removed)]
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Conflicts:
lib/bb/cooker.py
lib/bb/main.py
lib/bb/tinfoil.py
lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
---
bin/bitbake | 7 ++++++-
lib/bb/cooker.py | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
lib/bb/tinfoil.py | 5 +++++
lib/bb/ui/knotty.py | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
lib/bb/utils.py | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/bitbake b/bin/bitbake
index a2e8cc1..d3055fb 100755
--- a/bin/bitbake
+++ b/bin/bitbake
@@ -263,13 +263,18 @@ def start_server(servermodule, configParams, configuration, features):
logger.handle(event)
raise exc_info[1], None, exc_info[2]
server.detach()
+ cooker.lock.close()
return server
def main():
- configParams = BitBakeConfigParameters()
+ # Python multiprocessing requires /dev/shm on Linux
+ if sys.platform.startswith('linux') and not os.access('/dev/shm', os.W_OK | os.X_OK):
+ raise sys.exit("FATAL: /dev/shm does not exist or is not writable")
+
+ conaigParams = BitBakeConfigParameters()
configuration = cookerdata.CookerConfiguration()
configuration.setConfigParameters(configParams)
diff --git a/lib/bb/cooker.py b/lib/bb/cooker.py
index aeb3f71..098fadd 100644
--- a/lib/bb/cooker.py
+++ b/lib/bb/cooker.py
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ import bb, bb.exceptions, bb.command
from bb import utils, data, parse, event, cache, providers, taskdata, runqueue
import Queue
import signal
+import subprocess
+import errno
import prserv.serv
import pyinotify
@@ -1441,7 +1443,34 @@ class BBCooker:
def post_serve(self):
prserv.serv.auto_shutdown(self.data)
- bb.event.fire(CookerExit(), self.event_data)
+ bb.event.fire(CookerExit(), self.expanded_data)
+ lockfile = self.lock.name
+ self.lock.close()
+ self.lock = None
+
+ while not self.lock:
+ with bb.utils.timeout(3):
+ self.lock = bb.utils.lockfile(lockfile, shared=False, retry=False, block=True)
+ if not self.lock:
+ # Some systems may not have lsof available
+ procs = None
+ try:
+ procs = subprocess.check_output(["lsof", '-w', lockfile], stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
+ except OSError as e:
+ if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+ raise
+ if procs is None:
+ # Fall back to fuser if lsof is unavailable
+ try:
+ procs = subprocess.check_output(["fuser", '-v', lockfile], stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
+ except OSError as e:
+ if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+ raise
+
+ msg = "Delaying shutdown due to active processes which appear to be holding bitbake.lock"
+ if procs:
+ msg += ":\n%s" % str(procs)
+ print(msg)
def shutdown(self, force = False):
if force:
diff --git a/lib/bb/tinfoil.py b/lib/bb/tinfoil.py
index 6bcbd47..277131f 100644
--- a/lib/bb/tinfoil.py
+++ b/lib/bb/tinfoil.py
@@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ class Tinfoil:
else:
self.parseRecipes()
+ def shutdown(self):
+ self.cooker.shutdown(force=True)
+ self.cooker.post_serve()
+ self.cooker.unlockBitbake()
+
class TinfoilConfigParameters(ConfigParameters):
def __init__(self, **options):
diff --git a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
index 9e58b31..8466455 100644
--- a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
+++ b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py
@@ -536,24 +536,29 @@ def main(server, eventHandler, params, tf = TerminalFilter):
if not params.observe_only:
_, error = server.runCommand(["stateForceShutdown"])
main.shutdown = 2
- summary = ""
- if taskfailures:
- summary += pluralise("\nSummary: %s task failed:",
- "\nSummary: %s tasks failed:", len(taskfailures))
- for failure in taskfailures:
- summary += "\n %s" % failure
- if warnings:
- summary += pluralise("\nSummary: There was %s WARNING message shown.",
- "\nSummary: There were %s WARNING messages shown.", warnings)
- if return_value and errors:
- summary += pluralise("\nSummary: There was %s ERROR message shown, returning a non-zero exit code.",
- "\nSummary: There were %s ERROR messages shown, returning a non-zero exit code.", errors)
- if summary:
- print(summary)
-
- if interrupted:
- print("Execution was interrupted, returning a non-zero exit code.")
- if return_value == 0:
- return_value = 1
+ try:
+ summary = ""
+ if taskfailures:
+ summary += pluralise("\nSummary: %s task failed:",
+ "\nSummary: %s tasks failed:", len(taskfailures))
+ for failure in taskfailures:
+ summary += "\n %s" % failure
+ if warnings:
+ summary += pluralise("\nSummary: There was %s WARNING message shown.",
+ "\nSummary: There were %s WARNING messages shown.", warnings)
+ if return_value and errors:
+ summary += pluralise("\nSummary: There was %s ERROR message shown, returning a non-zero exit code.",
+ "\nSummary: There were %s ERROR messages shown, returning a non-zero exit code.", errors)
+ if summary:
+ print(summary)
+
+ if interrupted:
+ print("Execution was interrupted, returning a non-zero exit code.")
+ if return_value == 0:
+ return_value = 1
+ except IOError as e:
+ import errno
+ if e.errno == errno.EPIPE:
+ pass
return return_value
diff --git a/lib/bb/utils.py b/lib/bb/utils.py
index 2562db8..f217ae3 100644
--- a/lib/bb/utils.py
+++ b/lib/bb/utils.py
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ import subprocess
import glob
import traceback
import errno
+import signal
from commands import getstatusoutput
from contextlib import contextmanager
@@ -386,10 +387,30 @@ def fileslocked(files):
for lock in locks:
bb.utils.unlockfile(lock)
-def lockfile(name, shared=False, retry=True):
+@contextmanager
+def timeout(seconds):
+ def timeout_handler(signum, frame):
+ pass
+
+ original_handler = signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, timeout_handler)
+
+ try:
+ signal.alarm(seconds)
+ yield
+ finally:
+ signal.alarm(0)
+ signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, original_handler)
+
+def lockfile(name, shared=False, retry=True, block=False):
"""
- Use the file fn as a lock file, return when the lock has been acquired.
- Returns a variable to pass to unlockfile().
+ Use the specified file as a lock file, return when the lock has
+ been acquired. Returns a variable to pass to unlockfile().
+ Parameters:
+ retry: True to re-try locking if it fails, False otherwise
+ block: True to block until the lock succeeds, False otherwise
+ The retry and block parameters are kind of equivalent unless you
+ consider the possibility of sending a signal to the process to break
+ out - at which point you want block=True rather than retry=True.
"""
dirname = os.path.dirname(name)
mkdirhier(dirname)
@@ -402,7 +423,7 @@ def lockfile(name, shared=False, retry=True):
op = fcntl.LOCK_EX
if shared:
op = fcntl.LOCK_SH
- if not retry:
+ if not retry and not block:
op = op | fcntl.LOCK_NB
while True:
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 17:48 Saul Wold [this message]
2015-08-22 10:11 ` [PATCH][1.24/Dizzy] cooker: properly fix bitbake.lock handling Richard Purdie
2015-08-24 14:59 ` Paul Eggleton
2015-08-28 16:08 [PATCH][1.24/dizzy] " Saul Wold
2015-08-28 16:38 ` akuster
2015-08-29 6:16 ` Saul Wold
2015-08-31 18:16 ` akuster808
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440092897-6518-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akuster808@gmail.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.