All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	mcgrof@do-not-panic.com, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86: Use larger chunks in mtrr_cleanup
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:21:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441322474.3277.78.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150903224556.GY8051@wotan.suse.de>

On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 00:45 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:25:31PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 00:07 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >  :
> > > These are still at odds, for instance, I was under the impression we can
> > > just have the OS return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID if the OS / drivers never used
> > > or set up MTRR, but the platform did, above (not the patch) you seem to 
> > > be saying that even if the OS didn't modify MTRRs the OS still needs to
> > > return the appropriately set up MTRR type by firmware. This is 
> > > different. Can you clarify?
> > 
> > mtrr_type_lookup() returns valid MTRR cache type for a given address range
> > when MTRRs are enabled.  It does not matter if MTRRs are set by the 
> > firmware or the OS.  When MTRRs are enabled, the kernel needs to check 
> > through mtrr_type_lookup() that large page mapping requests are aligned 
> > with MTRRs.
> 
> One further change I was considering was seeing if we can separate PAT
> set up from MTRR's setup, but that was under the assumption we could live
> with a kernel that would have mtrr_type_lookup() return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID
> if kernel MTRR code is completely disabled but PAT enabled. We can't enable 
> PAT today without MTRR beceause PAT is initialized from the MTRR init 
> sequence and that depends on MTRR, if we separated these though and and if a 
> distro disabled kernel MTRR an but enabled PAT and if MTRR did set up MTRR 
> what would the possible issues be?

PAT's dependency to MTRR could be removed, but I would not recommend disabling
the MTRR option since most of the firmwares enable MTRRs.  When the kernel has
the MTRR option disabled, but the firmware enables MTRRs, the kernel is unable
to verify if a large page mapping is aligned with MTRRs.  This can lead
undefined behavior when such an unaligned map with MTRRs is created and
accessed.

> > On Xen,
> 
> When Xen is used a platform firmware may still set up MTRR, even if the
> hypervisor doesn't set up MTRR right ? So same issue and question here.

Right, I meant to say Xen guests.  In case of the Xen hypervisor,
mtrr_type_lookup() returns a valid type as it runs on a platform.

Thanks,
-Toshi

> > or on a platform with firmware that does not enable MTRRs,
> > mtrr_type_lookup() returns MTRR_TYPE_INVALID (as long as the kernel does 
> > not enable them).
> 
> Sure this makes sense.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
>   Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-03 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <55E477DE.2060106@gmail.com>
2015-08-31 16:05 ` Stuart Hayes
2015-09-03  2:45   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 12:17     ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-09-03 17:59       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 18:10         ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-09-03 18:40           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 19:22             ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-03 19:51               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 21:31                 ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-03 22:07                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 22:25                     ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-03 22:45                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-03 23:21                         ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-09-03 23:54                           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-04  0:48                             ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-04  1:40                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-09-04 14:56                                 ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-04  6:51                             ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 14:46       ` Stuart Hayes
2015-11-05 19:14         ` Yinghai Lu
2015-11-05 19:43           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-03-16 20:20             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-03-29 17:07               ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441322474.3277.78.camel@hpe.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86: Use larger chunks in mtrr_cleanup' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.