All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	pi3orama@163.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] perf probe: Attach trace_probe_event with perf_probe_event
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2015 21:16:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441368963-11565-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441368963-11565-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>

From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>

This patch drops struct __event_package structure.  Instead, it adds
trace_probe_event into 'struct perf_probe_event'.

trace_probe_event information gives further patches a chance to access
actual probe points and actual arguments.  Using them, perf probe can
get whole list of added probes and print them at once.

Other users like upcoming bpf_loader will be able to attach one bpf
program to different probing points of an inline functions (which has
multiple probing points) and glob functions.  Moreover, by reading
arguments information, bpf code for reading those arguments can be
generated.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
[namhyung: extract necessary part from the existing patch]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 57 +++++++++++++------------------------------
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.h |  5 ++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index 2c762f41e7a5..0d3a051b9202 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -2759,59 +2759,39 @@ static int convert_to_probe_trace_events(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
 	return find_probe_trace_events_from_map(pev, tevs);
 }
 
-struct __event_package {
-	struct perf_probe_event		*pev;
-	struct probe_trace_event	*tevs;
-	int				ntevs;
-};
-
-static int convert_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
-				     struct __event_package **ppkgs)
+int convert_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 {
 	int i, ret;
-	struct __event_package *pkgs;
-
-	ret = 0;
-	pkgs = zalloc(sizeof(struct __event_package) * npevs);
-
-	if (pkgs == NULL)
-		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = init_symbol_maps(pevs->uprobes);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		free(pkgs);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	/* Loop 1: convert all events */
 	for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
-		pkgs[i].pev = &pevs[i];
 		/* Init kprobe blacklist if needed */
-		if (!pkgs[i].pev->uprobes)
+		if (!pevs[i].uprobes)
 			kprobe_blacklist__init();
 		/* Convert with or without debuginfo */
-		ret  = convert_to_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev,
-						     &pkgs[i].tevs);
+		ret  = convert_to_probe_trace_events(&pevs[i], &pevs[i].tevs);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
-		pkgs[i].ntevs = ret;
+		pevs[i].ntevs = ret;
 	}
 	/* This just release blacklist only if allocated */
 	kprobe_blacklist__release();
 
-	*ppkgs = pkgs;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int apply_perf_probe_events(struct __event_package *pkgs, int npevs)
+int apply_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 {
 	int i, ret = 0;
 
 	/* Loop 2: add all events */
 	for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
-		ret = __add_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev, pkgs[i].tevs,
-					       pkgs[i].ntevs,
+		ret = __add_probe_trace_events(&pevs[i], pevs[i].tevs,
+					       pevs[i].ntevs,
 					       probe_conf.force_add);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
@@ -2819,33 +2799,30 @@ static int apply_perf_probe_events(struct __event_package *pkgs, int npevs)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void cleanup_perf_probe_events(struct __event_package *pkgs, int npevs)
+void cleanup_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 {
 	int i, j;
 
-	if (pkgs == NULL)
-		return;
-
 	/* Loop 3: cleanup and free trace events  */
 	for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < pkgs[i].ntevs; j++)
-			clear_probe_trace_event(&pkgs[i].tevs[j]);
-		zfree(&pkgs[i].tevs);
+		for (j = 0; j < pevs[i].ntevs; j++)
+			clear_probe_trace_event(&pevs[i].tevs[j]);
+		zfree(&pevs[i].tevs);
+		pevs[i].ntevs = 0;
 	}
-	free(pkgs);
+
 	exit_symbol_maps();
 }
 
 int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 {
 	int ret;
-	struct __event_package *pkgs = NULL;
 
-	ret = convert_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs, &pkgs);
+	ret = convert_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs);
 	if (ret == 0)
-		ret = apply_perf_probe_events(pkgs, npevs);
+		ret = apply_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs);
 
-	cleanup_perf_probe_events(pkgs, npevs);
+	cleanup_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
index 6e7ec68a4aa8..70c327bd61de 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ struct perf_probe_event {
 	bool			uprobes;	/* Uprobe event flag */
 	char			*target;	/* Target binary */
 	struct perf_probe_arg	*args;	/* Arguments */
+	struct probe_trace_event *tevs;
+	int			ntevs;
 };
 
 /* Line range */
@@ -138,6 +140,9 @@ extern void line_range__clear(struct line_range *lr);
 extern int line_range__init(struct line_range *lr);
 
 extern int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs);
+extern int convert_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs);
+extern int apply_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs);
+extern void cleanup_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs);
 extern int del_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter);
 extern int show_perf_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter);
 extern int show_line_range(struct line_range *lr, const char *module,
-- 
2.5.0


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04 12:15 [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events() Namhyung Kim
2015-09-04 12:16 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-09-08 14:39   ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Link trace_probe_event into perf_probe_event tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-09-04 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf probe: Move print logic into cmd_probe() Namhyung Kim
2015-09-08 14:39   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-09-04 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf probe: Split del_perf_probe_events() Namhyung Kim
2015-09-08 14:40   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-09-04 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf probe: Print deleted events in cmd_probe() Namhyung Kim
2015-09-07  1:12   ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-09-08 14:40   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2015-09-06  7:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events() Wangnan (F)
2015-09-08  1:53   ` Namhyung Kim
2015-09-10  2:23   ` Namhyung Kim
2015-09-10  5:00     ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-09-10  6:40       ` Namhyung Kim
2015-09-10  8:10         ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-09-11 16:29           ` Namhyung Kim
2015-09-08 14:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441368963-11565-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.