From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759530AbbIDNN1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:13:27 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:50517 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933233AbbIDNKi (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:10:38 -0400 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: "Amanieu d'Antras" , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 128/130] signalfd: fix information leak in signalfd_copyinfo Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:08:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1441372118-5933-129-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1441372118-5933-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1441372118-5933-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.7-ckt17 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Amanieu d'Antras commit 3ead7c52bdb0ab44f4bb1feed505a8323cc12ba7 upstream. This function may copy the si_addr_lsb field to user mode when it hasn't been initialized, which can leak kernel stack data to user mode. Just checking the value of si_code is insufficient because the same si_code value is shared between multiple signals. This is solved by checking the value of si_signo in addition to si_code. Signed-off-by: Amanieu d'Antras Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- fs/signalfd.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/signalfd.c b/fs/signalfd.c index 424b7b65321f..148f8e7af882 100644 --- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -121,8 +121,9 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct signalfd_siginfo __user *uinfo, * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field, * so check explicitly for the right codes here. */ - if (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || - kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO) + if (kinfo->si_signo == SIGBUS && + (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || + kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)) err |= __put_user((short) kinfo->si_addr_lsb, &uinfo->ssi_addr_lsb); #endif