From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: add feature audit_lost reset Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:12:00 -0500 Message-ID: <14416625.8shW6piCVY@x2> References: <75c9c4dcd0a57ba6afec676ec55155e70ccb6a28.1481370732.git.rgb@redhat.com> <1803050.hqkP3u55ii@x2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Paul Moore Cc: Richard Guy Briggs , linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thursday, December 15, 2016 7:50:48 PM EST Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > > I'm planning to replace all the config change logging with the > > audit_log_task_simple function I sent so that we have everything. Can we > > go ahead and pull that in so that we can start using it? > > There needs to be more than one user of the function to make it > worthwhile; so far that function has only been proposed with a single > user. Propose it with multiple users and we can look at it seriously. That's because I have several unrelated patches that use it. Do you want me to send all of them at once? There's going to be at least 5 users of the function. Possibly more. I want it to be the default for all future events added because it concisely gives the necessary information for well-formed events. -Steve