From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:46:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 10/13] soc: versatile: add support for the PB11MPCore In-Reply-To: <1444916813-31024-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> References: <1444916813-31024-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1444916813-31024-11-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The SoC driver needs a minor update to display the correct sysfs information for the PB11MPCore. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- I wonder if I should Cc: arm at kernel.org on patches like this. They seem to be the default drivers/soc maintainers. --- drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c b/drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c index e642c4540dda..c337764de867 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c +++ b/drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ static const char *realview_board_str(u32 id) switch ((id >> 16) & 0xfff) { case 0x0147: return "HBI-0147"; + case 0x0159: + return "HBI-0159"; default: return "Unknown"; } @@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ static const char *realview_board_str(u32 id) static const char *realview_arch_str(u32 id) { switch ((id >> 8) & 0xf) { + case 0x04: + return "AHB"; case 0x05: return "Multi-layer AXI"; default: -- 2.4.3