From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Switch to merged qemu-xen{,
 -traditional}.git trees
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1445425629.9563.88.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1442482630.18856.145.camel@citrix.com>
	<1442482648-25666-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
	<22010.38503.791420.451291@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1442486620.18856.168.camel@citrix.com>
	<1442486842.18856.170.camel@citrix.com>
	<22030.35325.690324.254600@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1443793989.11707.121.camel@citrix.com>
	<22052.55175.145023.84360@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1445337272.9563.28.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1445337272.9563.28.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 11:34 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 12:44 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Switch to merged qemu-xen{,
> > -traditional}.git trees"):
> > > We discussed on IRC with you and Stefano and are going to aim to push
> > > this
> > > in the w/c 19 October.
> > 
> > We have decided under the circumstances to postpone this to next week.
> > 
> > It would probably have been possible for me to pick things up from
> > the deployment plan in your mail
> >    [PATCH OSSTEST+XEN 0/1+1] Switching to one qemu tree per qemu
> > version
> > (trad vs upstream)
> > But it seems better to wait for you to be back.
> 
> That was probably wise, although I'm on vacation next week.
> 
> I thought maybe I'd be able to manage it today given the existence of the
> checklist, but I think actually I'm too fuzzy headed even for that.

I am back and well enough to begin, so I am doing this now.

Ian.