From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1445474248.30908.115.camel@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Add --lite option From: Geoff Levand Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:37:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5628279C.7030104@ozlabs.org> References: <1445469125.30908.105.camel@infradead.org> <5628279C.7030104@ozlabs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Anton Blanchard , Petitboot@lists.ozlabs.org Hi Jeremy, On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 08:02 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Add a new option --lite to kexec that allows for a fast reboot > > by avoiding the purgatory integrity checks. This option is > > intended for use by kexec based bootloaders that load a new > > image and then immediately transfer control to it. > > Can we call this something other than 'lite'? I'd want to prevent any > confusion when referring to 'kexec-lite', which is a separate > project. Well, that is why I chose the name 'lite', because it mimics what kexec -lite does... What do others think? -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec