All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Don't ignore a write in ITARGETSR if one field is 0
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:07:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445530071.2374.40.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444659760-24123-3-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 15:22 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> The current implementation ignores the whole write if one of the field is
> 0. Although, based on the spec (4.3.12 IHI 0048B.b), 0 is a valid value
> when:
>     - The interrupt is not wired in the distributor. From the Xen
>     point of view, it means that the corresponding bit is not set in
>     d->arch.vgic.allocated_irqs.
>     - The user wants to disable the IRQ forwarding in the distributor.
>     I.e the IRQ stays pending in the distributor and never received by
>     the guest.
> 
> Implementing the later will require more work in Xen because we always
> assume the interrupt is forwarded to vCPU. So for now, ignore any field
> where the value is 0.
> 
> The emulation of the write access of ITARGETSR has been reworked and
> moved to a new function because it would have been difficult to
> implement properly the behavior with the current code.
> 
> The new implementation is breaking the register in 4 distinct bytes. For
> each byte, it will check the validity of the target list, find the new
> target, migrate the interrupt and store the value if necessary.
> 
> In the new implementation there is nearly no distinction of the access
> size to avoid having too many different path which is harder to test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
> 
> ---
>     This change used to be embedded in "xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way
>     to store the target vCPU in the rank". It has been moved out to
>     avoid having too much functional changes in a single patch.
> 
>     I'm not sure if this patch should be backported to Xen 4.6. Without
>     it any guest writing 0 in one the field won't be able to migrate
>     other interrupts. Although, in all the use case I've seen, the guest
>     is read ITARGETSR first and write-back the value with the
>     corresponding byte changed.
> 
>     Changes in v4:
>         - Patch added
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> ------
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> index 665afeb..6b7eab3 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,94 @@ void vgic_v2_setup_hw(paddr_t dbase, paddr_t cbase,
> paddr_t vbase)
>      vgic_v2_hw.vbase = vbase;
>  }
>  
> +#define NR_TARGET_PER_REG 4U
> +#define NR_BIT_PER_TARGET 8U

NR_TARGETS_ and NR_BITS_...

"REG" there is a bit generic, given this only works for registers with 8
-bit fields, _ITARGETSR instead?

> +/*
> + * Store a ITARGETSR register. This function only deals with ITARGETSR8
> + * and onwards.
> + *
> + * Note the offset will be aligned to the appropriate boundary.
> + */
> +static void vgic_store_itargetsr(struct domain *d, struct vgic_irq_rank
> *rank,
> +                                 unsigned int offset, uint32_t
> itargetsr)
> +{
> +    unsigned int i;
> +    unsigned int regidx = REG_RANK_INDEX(8, offset, DABT_WORD);
> +    unsigned int virq;
> +
> +    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&rank->lock));
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The ITARGETSR0-7, used for SGIs/PPIs, are implemented RO in the
> +     * emulation and should never call this function.
> +     *
> +     * They all live in the first rank.
> +     */
> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(NR_INTERRUPT_PER_RANK != 32);
> +    ASSERT(rank->index >= 1);
> +
> +    offset &= INTERRUPT_RANK_MASK;
> +    offset &= ~(NR_TARGET_PER_REG - 1);
> +
> +    virq = rank->index * NR_INTERRUPT_PER_RANK + offset;
> +
> +    for ( i = 0; i < NR_TARGET_PER_REG; i++, offset++, virq++ )
> +    {
> +        unsigned int new_target, old_target;
> +        uint8_t new_mask, old_mask;
> +
> +        new_mask = itargetsr & ((1 << NR_BIT_PER_TARGET) - 1);
> +        old_mask = vgic_byte_read(rank->v2.itargets[regidx], i);
> +
> +        itargetsr >>= NR_BIT_PER_TARGET;

This is really a part of the for() iteration expression, but oddly place
here.

If you turn the "((1 << NR_BIT_PER_TARGET) - 1)" thing into a #define or
constant, then you may find that extracting the relevant byte from the
unshifted itargetsr using (itargetsr >> (i*NR_BITS_PER_TARGET) and then
applying the mask is clean enough to use here instead.

I don't think you rely on the shifting of itargetsr apart from when
calculating new_mask.

> +        /*
> +         * SPIs are using the 1-N model (see 1.4.3 in ARM IHI 0048B).
> +         * While the interrupt could be set pending to all the vCPUs in
> +         * target list, it's not guarantee by the spec.

"guaranteed"

> +         * For simplicity, always route the vIRQ to the first interrupt
> +         * in the target list
> +         */
> +        new_target = ffs(new_mask);
> +        old_target = ffs(old_mask);
> +
> +        /* The current target should always be valid */
> +        ASSERT(old_target && (old_target <= d->max_vcpus));
> +
> +        /*
> +         * Ignore the write request for this interrupt if the new target
> +         * is invalid.
> +         * XXX: From the spec, if the target list is not valid, the
> +         * interrupt should be ignored (i.e not forwarding to the

"forwarded".

> +         * guest).
> +         */
> +        if ( !new_target || (new_target > d->max_vcpus) )
> +        {
> +            printk(XENLOG_G_DEBUG

gdprintk?

> +                   "d%d: No valid vCPU found for vIRQ%u in the target list (%#x). Skip it\n",
> +                   d->domain_id, virq, new_mask);
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* The vCPU ID always starts from 0 */
> +        new_target--;
> +        old_target--;
> +
> +        /* Only migrate the vIRQ if the target vCPU has changed */
> +        if ( new_target != old_target )
> +        {
> +            vgic_migrate_irq(d->vcpu[old_target],
> +                             d->vcpu[new_target],
> +                             virq);
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Bit corresponding to unimplemented CPU is write-ignored. */

"write-ignore"

> +        new_mask &= (1 << d->max_vcpus) - 1;
> +        vgic_byte_write(&rank->v2.itargets[regidx], new_mask, i);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static int vgic_v2_distr_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
>                                     register_t *r, void *priv)
>  {
> @@ -337,56 +425,23 @@ static int vgic_v2_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v,
> mmio_info_t *info,
>  
>      case GICD_ITARGETSR + 8 ... GICD_ITARGETSRN:
>      {
> -        /* unsigned long needed for find_next_bit */
> -        unsigned long target;
> -        int i;
> +        uint32_t itargetsr;
> +
>          if ( dabt.size != DABT_BYTE && dabt.size != DABT_WORD ) goto
> bad_width;
>          rank = vgic_rank_offset(v, 8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR,
> DABT_WORD);
>          if ( rank == NULL) goto write_ignore;
> -        /* 8-bit vcpu mask for this domain */
> -        BUG_ON(v->domain->max_vcpus > 8);
> -        target = (1 << v->domain->max_vcpus) - 1;
> -        target = target | (target << 8) | (target << 16) | (target <<
> 24);
> +        vgic_lock_rank(v, rank, flags);
>          if ( dabt.size == DABT_WORD )
> -            target &= r;
> +            itargetsr = r;
>          else
> -            target &= (r << (8 * (gicd_reg & 0x3)));
> -        /* ignore zero writes */
> -        if ( !target )
> -            goto write_ignore;
> -        /* For word reads ignore writes where any single byte is zero */
> -        if ( dabt.size == 2 &&
> -            !((target & 0xff) && (target & (0xff << 8)) &&
> -             (target & (0xff << 16)) && (target & (0xff << 24))))
> -            goto write_ignore;
> -        vgic_lock_rank(v, rank, flags);
> -        i = 0;
> -        while ( (i = find_next_bit(&target, 32, i)) < 32 )
>          {
> -            unsigned int irq, new_target, old_target;
> -            unsigned long old_target_mask;
> -            struct vcpu *v_target, *v_old;
> -
> -            new_target = i % 8;
> -            old_target_mask = vgic_byte_read(rank
> ->v2.itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8,
> -                                             gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR,
> DABT_WORD)], i/8);
> -            old_target = find_first_bit(&old_target_mask, 8);
> -
> -            if ( new_target != old_target )
> -            {
> -                irq = (gicd_reg & ~0x3) - GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 8);
> -                v_target = v->domain->vcpu[new_target];
> -                v_old = v->domain->vcpu[old_target];
> -                vgic_migrate_irq(v_old, v_target, irq);
> -            }
> -            i += 8 - new_target;
> +            itargetsr = rank->v2.itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8,
> +                                    gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR,
> +                                    DABT_WORD)];
> +            vgic_byte_write(&itargetsr, r, gicd_reg);
>          }
> -        if ( dabt.size == DABT_WORD )
> -            rank->v2.itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8, gicd_reg -
> GICD_ITARGETSR,
> -                                             DABT_WORD)] = target;
> -        else
> -            vgic_byte_write(&rank->v2.itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8,
> -                      gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR, DABT_WORD)], r,
> gicd_reg);
> +        vgic_store_itargetsr(v->domain, rank, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR,
> +                             itargetsr);
>          vgic_unlock_rank(v, rank, flags);
>          return 1;
>      }

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12 14:22 [PATCH v4 0/5] xen/arm: vgic: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit register Julien Grall
2015-10-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Handle correctly byte write in ITARGETSR Julien Grall
2015-10-22 15:53   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-22 16:36     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23  9:33       ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-23  9:58         ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23 10:12           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] xen/arm: vgic-v2: Don't ignore a write in ITARGETSR if one field is 0 Julien Grall
2015-10-22 16:07   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-10-22 16:51     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23  9:30       ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-23  9:37         ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23  9:53           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to store the target vCPU in the rank Julien Grall
2015-10-22 16:17   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-22 17:15     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23  9:34       ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-23 10:01         ` Julien Grall
2015-10-23 10:14           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-23 10:15             ` Julien Grall
2015-10-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] xen/arm: vgic: Introduce helpers to extract/update/clear/set vGIC register Julien Grall
2015-10-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] xen/arm: vgic-v3: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit registers Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445530071.2374.40.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.