From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754744AbbJ1AIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:08:49 -0400 Received: from g2t4619.austin.hp.com ([15.73.212.82]:37791 "EHLO g2t4619.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753385AbbJ1AIs (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:08:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1445990693.20657.98.camel@hpe.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again From: Toshi Kani To: Linus Torvalds , Stas Sergeev , Andrew Morton , Toshi Kani , Ingo Molnar Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Denys Vlasenko , Borislav Petkov , Stas Sergeev Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:04:53 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <562E126E.6030300@list.ru> <562F84AE.1030500@list.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > > > > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear - > > machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is > > possible to get one, but difficult to screen-shot (using bare > > metal, not VM). Also the Oops was seemingly unrelated. > > And if you run "dosemu -s" under non-KMS console, you'll also > > reproduce this one: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97321 > > Hmm. Andrew Morton responded to that initially, but then nothing > happened, and now it's been another six months. Andrew? > > The arch/x86/mm/pat.c error handling does seem to be suspect. This is > all code several years old, so none of this is new, and I think Suresh > is gone. Adding a few other people with recent sign-offs to that > file, in the hope that somebody feels like they own it.. In the case of PFNMAP, the range should always be mapped. So, I wonder why follow_phys() failed with the !pte_present() check. Stas, do you have a test program that can reproduce 97321? -Toshi