From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvnvl-0006tI-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:00:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvnvg-0007Fg-Lo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:00:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]:34779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvnvg-0007Fb-GL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:00:20 -0500 Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so108509299wmn.1 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 07:00:20 -0800 (PST) From: Leonid Bloch Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:59:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1447081170-11614-7-git-send-email-leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com> In-Reply-To: <1447081170-11614-1-git-send-email-leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com> References: <1447081170-11614-1-git-send-email-leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 6/8] e1000: Fixing the received/transmitted octets' counters List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Dmitry Fleytman , Jason Wang , Leonid Bloch , Shmulik Ladkani Previously, these 64-bit registers did not stick at their maximal values when (and if) they reached them, as they should do, according to the specs. This patch introduces a function that takes care of such registers, avoiding code duplication, making the relevant parts more compatible with the QEMU coding style, while ensuring that in the unlikely case of reaching the maximal value, the counter will stick there, as it supposed to. Signed-off-by: Leonid Bloch Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fleytman --- hw/net/e1000.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/net/e1000.c b/hw/net/e1000.c index c301637..c262663 100644 --- a/hw/net/e1000.c +++ b/hw/net/e1000.c @@ -588,6 +588,20 @@ inc_reg_if_not_full(E1000State *s, int index) } } +static void +grow_8reg_if_not_full(E1000State *s, int index, int size) +{ + uint64_t sum = s->mac_reg[index] | (uint64_t)s->mac_reg[index+1] << 32; + + if (sum + size < sum) { + sum = ~0ULL; + } else { + sum += size; + } + s->mac_reg[index] = sum; + s->mac_reg[index+1] = sum >> 32; +} + static inline int vlan_enabled(E1000State *s) { @@ -637,7 +651,7 @@ static void xmit_seg(E1000State *s) { uint16_t len, *sp; - unsigned int frames = s->tx.tso_frames, css, sofar, n; + unsigned int frames = s->tx.tso_frames, css, sofar; struct e1000_tx *tp = &s->tx; if (tp->tse && tp->cptse) { @@ -686,10 +700,8 @@ xmit_seg(E1000State *s) } inc_reg_if_not_full(s, TPT); + grow_8reg_if_not_full(s, TOTL, s->tx.size); s->mac_reg[GPTC] = s->mac_reg[TPT]; - n = s->mac_reg[TOTL]; - if ((s->mac_reg[TOTL] += s->tx.size) < n) - s->mac_reg[TOTH]++; } static void @@ -1104,11 +1116,9 @@ e1000_receive_iov(NetClientState *nc, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt) /* TOR - Total Octets Received: * This register includes bytes received in a packet from the field through the field, inclusively. + * Always include FCS length (4) in size. */ - n = s->mac_reg[TORL] + size + /* Always include FCS length. */ 4; - if (n < s->mac_reg[TORL]) - s->mac_reg[TORH]++; - s->mac_reg[TORL] = n; + grow_8reg_if_not_full(s, TORL, size+4); n = E1000_ICS_RXT0; if ((rdt = s->mac_reg[RDT]) < s->mac_reg[RDH]) -- 2.4.3