All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device	suspended assert
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:23:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761162sef.fsf@intel.com>

On pe, 2015-11-13 at 10:52 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > This is v3 of [1]. I addressed the review comments from Ville and
> > Chris
> > and added an RPM atomic section check as well requested by Chris. I
> > was
> > also considering using lockdep for more coverage, but decided to
> > leave
> > that out for now, we can also add that later if needed.
> > 
> > The patchset depends on Patrik's DC rework patchset [2].
> 
> Uh-oh, so now we have a reviewed series, except it depends on a
> series
> that isn't ready, which has its own dependencies, and I've lost track
> of
> all the series in flight by now... Imre, I trust you to move the
> review
> of the dependencies forward, pinging people as necessary.

Yes, there are the two DC/DMC patchsets you mentioned that would need
to get merged before this one, they are being reviewed atm. There is no
functional dependency, I only want to avoid merge conflicts. For
reference and if someone wants to experiment with it there is the
following branch with all 3 patchsets:

https://github.com/ideak/linux/commits/rpm-assert-improvements

--Imre

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/0
> > 79777.html
> > [2]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/07975
> > 8.html
> > 
> > Imre Deak (7):
> >   drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert
> > helpers
> >   drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper
> >   drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it
> >   drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference
> >   drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers
> >   drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections
> >   drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE
> >     updaters
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c         |  7 ++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         | 39 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c     | 33 ++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         | 12 +++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h        | 67
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 24 +++++-------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     | 19 +++-------
> >  9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.5.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-13 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 16:40 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:54   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:56   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:58   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-11-12 17:04   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 17:50     ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 20:41       ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 20:49         ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:27           ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 23:03   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:06   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 13:52   ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-11-13 14:08   ` [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:09   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13  8:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Jani Nikula
2015-11-13 14:23   ` Imre Deak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.