All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: <acme@kernel.org>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: <lizefan@huawei.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] perf tools: Add prologue for BPF programs for fetching arguments
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:10:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447675815-166222-11-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447675815-166222-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>

From: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>

This patch generates prologue for a BPF program which fetch arguments
for it. With this patch, the program can have arguments as follow:

 SEC("lock_page=__lock_page page->flags")
 int lock_page(struct pt_regs *ctx, int err, unsigned long flags)
 {
	 return 1;
 }

This patch passes at most 3 arguments from r3, r4 and r5. r1 is still
the ctx pointer. r2 is used to indicate the successfulness of
dereferencing.

This patch uses r6 to hold ctx (struct pt_regs) and r7 to hold stack
pointer for result. Result of each arguments first store on stack:

 low address
 BPF_REG_FP - 24  ARG3
 BPF_REG_FP - 16  ARG2
 BPF_REG_FP - 8   ARG1
 BPF_REG_FP
 high address

Then loaded into r3, r4 and r5.

The output prologue for offn(...off2(off1(reg)))) should be:

     r6 <- r1			// save ctx into a callee saved register
     r7 <- fp
     r7 <- r7 - stack_offset	// pointer to result slot
     /* load r3 with the offset in pt_regs of 'reg' */
     (r7) <- r3			// make slot valid
     r3 <- r3 + off1		// prepare to read unsafe pointer
     r2 <- 8
     r1 <- r7			// result put onto stack
     call probe_read		// read unsafe pointer
     jnei r0, 0, err		// error checking
     r3 <- (r7)			// read result
     r3 <- r3 + off2		// prepare to read unsafe pointer
     r2 <- 8
     r1 <- r7
     call probe_read
     jnei r0, 0, err
     ...
     /* load r2, r3, r4 from stack */
     goto success
err:
     r2 <- 1
     /* load r3, r4, r5 with 0 */
     goto usercode
success:
     r2 <- 0
usercode:
     r1 <- r6	// restore ctx
     // original user code

If all of arguments reside in register (dereferencing is not
required), gen_prologue_fastpath() will be used to create
fast prologue:

     r3 <- (r1 + offset of reg1)
     r4 <- (r1 + offset of reg2)
     r5 <- (r1 + offset of reg3)
     r2 <- 0

P.S.

eBPF calling convention is defined as:

* r0		- return value from in-kernel function, and exit value
                  for eBPF program
* r1 - r5	- arguments from eBPF program to in-kernel function
* r6 - r9	- callee saved registers that in-kernel function will
                  preserve
* r10		- read-only frame pointer to access stack

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
---
 tools/perf/util/Build          |   1 +
 tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c   |   3 +
 tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h   |   3 +
 tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.c | 455 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.h |  34 +++
 5 files changed, 496 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.h

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 591b3fe..b9d56f2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ libperf-y += parse-branch-options.o
 libperf-y += parse-regs-options.o
 
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf-loader.o
+libperf-$(CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE) += bpf-prologue.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBELF) += symbol-elf.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBELF) += probe-file.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBELF) += probe-event.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
index 3694e16..e0045c3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ static const char *bpf_loader_strerror_table[NR_ERRNO] = {
 	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(INTERNAL)]	= "BPF loader internal error",
 	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(COMPILE)]	= "Error when compiling BPF scriptlet",
 	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(CONFIG_TERM)]	= "Invalid config term in config string",
+	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUE)]	= "Failed to generate prologue",
+	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUE2BIG)]	= "Prologue too big for program",
+	[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUEOOB)]	= "Offset out of bound for prologue",
 };
 
 static int
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
index d19f5c5..a58740b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ enum bpf_loader_errno {
 	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__INTERNAL,	/* BPF loader internal error */
 	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__COMPILE,	/* Error when compiling BPF scriptlet */
 	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__CONFIG_TERM,	/* Invalid config term in config term */
+	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE,	/* Failed to generate prologue */
+	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG,	/* Prologue too big for program */
+	BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUEOOB,	/* Offset out of bound for prologue */
 	__BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__END,
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6cdbee1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.c
@@ -0,0 +1,455 @@
+/*
+ * bpf-prologue.c
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 Huawei Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#include "perf.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "bpf-loader.h"
+#include "bpf-prologue.h"
+#include "probe-finder.h"
+#include <dwarf-regs.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+
+#define BPF_REG_SIZE		8
+
+#define JMP_TO_ERROR_CODE	-1
+#define JMP_TO_SUCCESS_CODE	-2
+#define JMP_TO_USER_CODE	-3
+
+struct bpf_insn_pos {
+	struct bpf_insn *begin;
+	struct bpf_insn *end;
+	struct bpf_insn *pos;
+};
+
+static inline int
+pos_get_cnt(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos)
+{
+	return pos->pos - pos->begin;
+}
+
+static int
+append_insn(struct bpf_insn new_insn, struct bpf_insn_pos *pos)
+{
+	if (!pos->pos)
+		return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG;
+
+	if (pos->pos + 1 >= pos->end) {
+		pr_err("bpf prologue: prologue too long\n");
+		pos->pos = NULL;
+		return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG;
+	}
+
+	*(pos->pos)++ = new_insn;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+check_pos(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos)
+{
+	if (!pos->pos || pos->pos >= pos->end)
+		return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Give it a shorter name */
+#define ins(i, p) append_insn((i), (p))
+
+/*
+ * Give a register name (in 'reg'), generate instruction to
+ * load register into an eBPF register rd:
+ *   'ldd target_reg, offset(ctx_reg)', where:
+ * ctx_reg is pre initialized to pointer of 'struct pt_regs'.
+ */
+static int
+gen_ldx_reg_from_ctx(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, int ctx_reg,
+		     const char *reg, int target_reg)
+{
+	int offset = regs_query_register_offset(reg);
+
+	if (offset < 0) {
+		pr_err("bpf: prologue: failed to get register %s\n",
+		       reg);
+		return offset;
+	}
+	ins(BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, target_reg, ctx_reg, offset), pos);
+
+	return check_pos(pos);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Generate a BPF_FUNC_probe_read function call.
+ *
+ * src_base_addr_reg is a register holding base address,
+ * dst_addr_reg is a register holding dest address (on stack),
+ * result is:
+ *
+ *  *[dst_addr_reg] = *([src_base_addr_reg] + offset)
+ *
+ * Arguments of BPF_FUNC_probe_read:
+ *     ARG1: ptr to stack (dest)
+ *     ARG2: size (8)
+ *     ARG3: unsafe ptr (src)
+ */
+static int
+gen_read_mem(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
+	     int src_base_addr_reg,
+	     int dst_addr_reg,
+	     long offset)
+{
+	/* mov arg3, src_base_addr_reg */
+	if (src_base_addr_reg != BPF_REG_ARG3)
+		ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG3, src_base_addr_reg), pos);
+	/* add arg3, #offset */
+	if (offset)
+		ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG3, offset), pos);
+
+	/* mov arg2, #reg_size */
+	ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_SIZE), pos);
+
+	/* mov arg1, dst_addr_reg */
+	if (dst_addr_reg != BPF_REG_ARG1)
+		ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, dst_addr_reg), pos);
+
+	/* Call probe_read  */
+	ins(BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), pos);
+	/*
+	 * Error processing: if read fail, goto error code,
+	 * will be relocated. Target should be the start of
+	 * error processing code.
+	 */
+	ins(BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, JMP_TO_ERROR_CODE),
+	    pos);
+
+	return check_pos(pos);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Each arg should be bare register. Fetch and save them into argument
+ * registers (r3 - r5).
+ *
+ * BPF_REG_1 should have been initialized with pointer to
+ * 'struct pt_regs'.
+ */
+static int
+gen_prologue_fastpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
+		      struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs)
+{
+	int i, err = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		err = gen_ldx_reg_from_ctx(pos, BPF_REG_1, args[i].value,
+					   BPF_PROLOGUE_START_ARG_REG + i);
+		if (err)
+			goto errout;
+	}
+
+	return check_pos(pos);
+errout:
+	return err;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Slow path:
+ *   At least one argument has the form of 'offset($rx)'.
+ *
+ * Following code first stores them into stack, then loads all of then
+ * to r2 - r5.
+ * Before final loading, the final result should be:
+ *
+ * low address
+ * BPF_REG_FP - 24  ARG3
+ * BPF_REG_FP - 16  ARG2
+ * BPF_REG_FP - 8   ARG1
+ * BPF_REG_FP
+ * high address
+ *
+ * For each argument (described as: offn(...off2(off1(reg)))),
+ * generates following code:
+ *
+ *  r7 <- fp
+ *  r7 <- r7 - stack_offset  // Ideal code should initialize r7 using
+ *                           // fp before generating args. However,
+ *                           // eBPF won't regard r7 as stack pointer
+ *                           // if it is generated by minus 8 from
+ *                           // another stack pointer except fp.
+ *                           // This is why we have to set r7
+ *                           // to fp for each variable.
+ *  r3 <- value of 'reg'-> generated using gen_ldx_reg_from_ctx()
+ *  (r7) <- r3       // skip following instructions for bare reg
+ *  r3 <- r3 + off1  . // skip if off1 == 0
+ *  r2 <- 8           \
+ *  r1 <- r7           |-> generated by gen_read_mem()
+ *  call probe_read    /
+ *  jnei r0, 0, err  ./
+ *  r3 <- (r7)
+ *  r3 <- r3 + off2  . // skip if off2 == 0
+ *  r2 <- 8           \  // r2 may be broken by probe_read, so set again
+ *  r1 <- r7           |-> generated by gen_read_mem()
+ *  call probe_read    /
+ *  jnei r0, 0, err  ./
+ *  ...
+ */
+static int
+gen_prologue_slowpath(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos,
+		      struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs)
+{
+	int err, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		struct probe_trace_arg *arg = &args[i];
+		const char *reg = arg->value;
+		struct probe_trace_arg_ref *ref = NULL;
+		int stack_offset = (i + 1) * -8;
+
+		pr_debug("prologue: fetch arg %d, base reg is %s\n",
+			 i, reg);
+
+		/* value of base register is stored into ARG3 */
+		err = gen_ldx_reg_from_ctx(pos, BPF_REG_CTX, reg,
+					   BPF_REG_ARG3);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("prologue: failed to get offset of register %s\n",
+			       reg);
+			goto errout;
+		}
+
+		/* Make r7 the stack pointer. */
+		ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_FP), pos);
+		/* r7 += -8 */
+		ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, stack_offset), pos);
+		/*
+		 * Store r3 (base register) onto stack
+		 * Ensure fp[offset] is set.
+		 * fp is the only valid base register when storing
+		 * into stack. We are not allowed to use r7 as base
+		 * register here.
+		 */
+		ins(BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_ARG3,
+				stack_offset), pos);
+
+		ref = arg->ref;
+		while (ref) {
+			pr_debug("prologue: arg %d: offset %ld\n",
+				 i, ref->offset);
+			err = gen_read_mem(pos, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_7,
+					   ref->offset);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("prologue: failed to generate probe_read function call\n");
+				goto errout;
+			}
+
+			ref = ref->next;
+			/*
+			 * Load previous result into ARG3. Use
+			 * BPF_REG_FP instead of r7 because verifier
+			 * allows FP based addressing only.
+			 */
+			if (ref)
+				ins(BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_ARG3,
+						BPF_REG_FP, stack_offset), pos);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Final pass: read to registers */
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
+		ins(BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_PROLOGUE_START_ARG_REG + i,
+				BPF_REG_FP, -BPF_REG_SIZE * (i + 1)), pos);
+
+	ins(BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, BPF_REG_0, 0, JMP_TO_SUCCESS_CODE), pos);
+
+	return check_pos(pos);
+errout:
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int
+prologue_relocate(struct bpf_insn_pos *pos, struct bpf_insn *error_code,
+		  struct bpf_insn *success_code, struct bpf_insn *user_code)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insn;
+
+	if (check_pos(pos))
+		return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG;
+
+	for (insn = pos->begin; insn < pos->pos; insn++) {
+		struct bpf_insn *target;
+		u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
+		u8 opcode;
+
+		if (class != BPF_JMP)
+			continue;
+		opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
+		if (opcode == BPF_CALL)
+			continue;
+
+		switch (insn->off) {
+		case JMP_TO_ERROR_CODE:
+			target = error_code;
+			break;
+		case JMP_TO_SUCCESS_CODE:
+			target = success_code;
+			break;
+		case JMP_TO_USER_CODE:
+			target = user_code;
+			break;
+		default:
+			pr_err("bpf prologue: internal error: relocation failed\n");
+			return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE;
+		}
+
+		insn->off = target - (insn + 1);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf__gen_prologue(struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs,
+		      struct bpf_insn *new_prog, size_t *new_cnt,
+		      size_t cnt_space)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *success_code = NULL;
+	struct bpf_insn *error_code = NULL;
+	struct bpf_insn *user_code = NULL;
+	struct bpf_insn_pos pos;
+	bool fastpath = true;
+	int err = 0, i;
+
+	if (!new_prog || !new_cnt)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (cnt_space > BPF_MAXINSNS)
+		cnt_space = BPF_MAXINSNS;
+
+	pos.begin = new_prog;
+	pos.end = new_prog + cnt_space;
+	pos.pos = new_prog;
+
+	if (!nargs) {
+		ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_PROLOGUE_FETCH_RESULT_REG, 0),
+		    &pos);
+
+		if (check_pos(&pos))
+			goto errout;
+
+		*new_cnt = pos_get_cnt(&pos);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (nargs > BPF_PROLOGUE_MAX_ARGS) {
+		pr_warning("bpf: prologue: %d arguments are dropped\n",
+			   nargs - BPF_PROLOGUE_MAX_ARGS);
+		nargs = BPF_PROLOGUE_MAX_ARGS;
+	}
+
+	/* First pass: validation */
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		struct probe_trace_arg_ref *ref = args[i].ref;
+
+		if (args[i].value[0] == '@') {
+			/* TODO: fetch global variable */
+			pr_err("bpf: prologue: global %s%+ld not support\n",
+				args[i].value, ref ? ref->offset : 0);
+			return -ENOTSUP;
+		}
+
+		while (ref) {
+			/* fastpath is true if all args has ref == NULL */
+			fastpath = false;
+
+			/*
+			 * Instruction encodes immediate value using
+			 * s32, ref->offset is long. On systems which
+			 * can't fill long in s32, refuse to process if
+			 * ref->offset too large (or small).
+			 */
+#ifdef __LP64__
+#define OFFSET_MAX	((1LL << 31) - 1)
+#define OFFSET_MIN	((1LL << 31) * -1)
+			if (ref->offset > OFFSET_MAX ||
+					ref->offset < OFFSET_MIN) {
+				pr_err("bpf: prologue: offset out of bound: %ld\n",
+				       ref->offset);
+				return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUEOOB;
+			}
+#endif
+			ref = ref->next;
+		}
+	}
+	pr_debug("prologue: pass validation\n");
+
+	if (fastpath) {
+		/* If all variables are registers... */
+		pr_debug("prologue: fast path\n");
+		err = gen_prologue_fastpath(&pos, args, nargs);
+		if (err)
+			goto errout;
+	} else {
+		pr_debug("prologue: slow path\n");
+
+		/* Initialization: move ctx to a callee saved register. */
+		ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_CTX, BPF_REG_ARG1), &pos);
+
+		err = gen_prologue_slowpath(&pos, args, nargs);
+		if (err)
+			goto errout;
+		/*
+		 * start of ERROR_CODE (only slow pass needs error code)
+		 *   mov r2 <- 1  // r2 is error number
+		 *   mov r3 <- 0  // r3, r4... should be touched or
+		 *                // verifier would complain
+		 *   mov r4 <- 0
+		 *   ...
+		 *   goto usercode
+		 */
+		error_code = pos.pos;
+		ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_PROLOGUE_FETCH_RESULT_REG, 1),
+		    &pos);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
+			ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV,
+					  BPF_PROLOGUE_START_ARG_REG + i,
+					  0),
+			    &pos);
+		ins(BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, BPF_REG_0, 0, JMP_TO_USER_CODE),
+				&pos);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * start of SUCCESS_CODE:
+	 *   mov r2 <- 0
+	 *   goto usercode  // skip
+	 */
+	success_code = pos.pos;
+	ins(BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_PROLOGUE_FETCH_RESULT_REG, 0), &pos);
+
+	/*
+	 * start of USER_CODE:
+	 *   Restore ctx to r1
+	 */
+	user_code = pos.pos;
+	if (!fastpath) {
+		/*
+		 * Only slow path needs restoring of ctx. In fast path,
+		 * register are loaded directly from r1.
+		 */
+		ins(BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_CTX), &pos);
+		err = prologue_relocate(&pos, error_code, success_code,
+					user_code);
+		if (err)
+			goto errout;
+	}
+
+	err = check_pos(&pos);
+	if (err)
+		goto errout;
+
+	*new_cnt = pos_get_cnt(&pos);
+	return 0;
+errout:
+	return err;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d94cbea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-prologue.h
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2015, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
+ * Copyright (C) 2015, Huawei Inc.
+ */
+#ifndef __BPF_PROLOGUE_H
+#define __BPF_PROLOGUE_H
+
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include "probe-event.h"
+
+#define BPF_PROLOGUE_MAX_ARGS 3
+#define BPF_PROLOGUE_START_ARG_REG BPF_REG_3
+#define BPF_PROLOGUE_FETCH_RESULT_REG BPF_REG_2
+
+#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
+int bpf__gen_prologue(struct probe_trace_arg *args, int nargs,
+		      struct bpf_insn *new_prog, size_t *new_cnt,
+		      size_t cnt_space);
+#else
+static inline int
+bpf__gen_prologue(struct probe_trace_arg *args __maybe_unused,
+		  int nargs __maybe_unused,
+		  struct bpf_insn *new_prog __maybe_unused,
+		  size_t *new_cnt,
+		  size_t cnt_space __maybe_unused)
+{
+	if (!new_cnt)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	*new_cnt = 0;
+	return -ENOTSUP;
+}
+#endif
+#endif /* __BPF_PROLOGUE_H */
-- 
1.8.3.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-16 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 12:10 [PATCH 00/13] perf tools: bpf: Improve BPF program ability Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf probe: Fix memory leaking on faiulre by clearing all probe_trace_events Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] perf probe: Clear probe_trace_event when add_probe_trace_event() fails Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf tools: Allow BPF program attach to uprobe events Wang Nan
2015-11-16 14:14   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-23 16:06   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf tools: Allow BPF program attach to modules Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:06   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: Allow attaching BPF programs to modules symbols tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] perf tools: Introduce strtobool() to string.c Wang Nan
2015-11-16 14:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-16 14:49     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-16 15:55       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-23 16:04   ` [tip:perf/core] tools: Clone the kernel's strtobool function tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] perf tools: Allow BPF program config probing options Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:06   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] bpf tools: Load a program with different instances using preprocessor Wang Nan
2015-11-16 19:02   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17  3:53     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-23 16:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] perf tools: Add BPF_PROLOGUE config options for further patches Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:05   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 09/13] perf tools: Compile dwarf-regs.c if CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE is on Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:05   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` Wang Nan [this message]
2015-11-23 16:07   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: Add prologue for BPF programs for fetching arguments tip-bot for He Kuang
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 11/13] perf tools: Generate prologue for BPF programs Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:07   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue Wang Nan
2015-11-17  1:29   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17  1:31     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-17  4:38     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-17 12:20       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17  8:32     ` [PATCH 0/5] perf tools: Improve BPF support Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:32       ` [PATCH 1/5] perf test: Fix 2 bugs in 'perf test BPF' Wang Nan
2015-11-17 12:56         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17 13:01           ` pi3orama
2015-11-17 13:34             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-23 16:08         ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Fix 'perf test BPF' when it fails to find a suitable vmlinux tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:32       ` [PATCH 2/5] perf tools: Use same BPF program if arguments are identical Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:08         ` [tip:perf/core] perf bpf: " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:32       ` [PATCH 3/5] perf test: Print result for each subtest for llvm Wang Nan
2015-11-17 13:03         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-23 16:09         ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Print result for each LLVM subtest tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:32       ` [PATCH 4/5] perf test: Print result for each subtest for BPF Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:09         ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Print result for each BPF subtest tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:32       ` [PATCH 5/5] perf test: Mute test cases if verbose == 0 Wang Nan
2015-11-17 13:11         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-23 16:10         ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Mute test cases error messages " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-17  8:38     ` [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue Wangnan (F)
2015-11-17  9:44     ` [PATCH] perf record: Support custom vmlinux path Wang Nan
2015-11-17 12:33       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17 12:42         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17 12:45           ` pi3orama
2015-11-19 14:03           ` [PATCH 0/2] perf tools: Builtin options related improvements Wang Nan
2015-11-19 14:03             ` [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Always give options even it not compiled Wang Nan
2015-11-20 10:54               ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-26  8:05                 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-26  9:06                   ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 14:03             ` [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Support custom vmlinux path Wang Nan
2015-11-23 16:08   ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Test the BPF prologue adding infrastructure tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 13/13] perf tools: Use same BPF program if arguments are identical Wang Nan
2015-11-17  3:05   ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-17 13:16     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-16 14:09 ` [PATCH 00/13] perf tools: bpf: Improve BPF program ability Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447675815-166222-11-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.