All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 0/3] *** ST95HF driver v5 ***
@ 2015-11-20 11:40 Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 1/3] NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support Shikha Singh
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shikha Singh @ 2015-11-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sameo, aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc
  Cc: raunaque.quaiser, manoj.kumar, sylvain.fidelis, patrick.sohn,
	shikha.singh, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

New patch series of ST95HF Linux Driver v5

Changelog:
v5:
1. Add read/write support of ISO15693 Type5 Tags.

v4:
1. Address feedback from Lars Steubesand:
	Fix of issue in sending RESET command to ST95HF.
2. Improvement of some comments in code.

v3:
Address feedbacks from Lars Steubesand:
	i)Included modification in drivers/nfc/Kconfig and
	drivers/nfc/Makefile to build ST95HF driver.
	ii)Included header file linux/property.h explicitely in core.c
	and all header files are included in sorted order.
	iii)GPL version is modified in MODULE_LICENSE to match with header.

v2.0:
1.Address feedbacks from Samuel:
	i)Code improvement and code optimization
2.Address feedbacks from Lars Steubesand:
	i)Code improvement and code optimization
	ii)Bug fix : Kernel crash due to race between irq_thread_handler()
	and  st95hf_remove() is resolved.
3.Address feedback from Christophe Henri Ricard:
	i)Correction in file headers.

v1.0:
First release of ST95HF driver.

Shikha Singh (3):
  NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support
  driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  DT: bindings: net: nfc: Add ST95HF binding doc

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt         |   50 +
 drivers/nfc/Kconfig                                |    1 +
 drivers/nfc/Makefile                               |    1 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig                         |   10 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile                        |    6 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c                          | 1273 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c                           |  167 +++
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h                           |   64 +
 net/nfc/digital_core.c                             |    3 +-
 9 files changed, 1574 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h

-- 
1.8.2.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 1/3] NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support
  2015-11-20 11:40 [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 0/3] *** ST95HF driver v5 *** Shikha Singh
@ 2015-11-20 11:40 ` Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 3/3] DT: bindings: net: nfc: Add ST95HF binding doc Shikha Singh
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shikha Singh @ 2015-11-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sameo, aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc
  Cc: raunaque.quaiser, manoj.kumar, sylvain.fidelis, patrick.sohn,
	shikha.singh, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

The definition of DIGITAL_PROTO_NFCA_RF_TECH is modified to support
ISO14443 Type4A tags. Without this change it is not possible to start
polling for ISO14443 Type4A tags from the initiator side.

Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh <shikha.singh@st.com>
---
 net/nfc/digital_core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 23c2a11..dd9003f 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
 #include "digital.h"
 
 #define DIGITAL_PROTO_NFCA_RF_TECH \
-	(NFC_PROTO_JEWEL_MASK | NFC_PROTO_MIFARE_MASK | NFC_PROTO_NFC_DEP_MASK)
+	(NFC_PROTO_JEWEL_MASK | NFC_PROTO_MIFARE_MASK | \
+	NFC_PROTO_NFC_DEP_MASK | NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_MASK)
 
 #define DIGITAL_PROTO_NFCB_RF_TECH	NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_B_MASK
 
-- 
1.8.2.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  2015-11-20 11:40 [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 0/3] *** ST95HF driver v5 *** Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 1/3] NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support Shikha Singh
@ 2015-11-20 11:40 ` Shikha Singh
  2015-12-20 17:50   ` Samuel Ortiz
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 3/3] DT: bindings: net: nfc: Add ST95HF binding doc Shikha Singh
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shikha Singh @ 2015-11-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sameo, aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc
  Cc: raunaque.quaiser, manoj.kumar, sylvain.fidelis, patrick.sohn,
	shikha.singh, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="y", Size: 44600 bytes --]

Release of linux driver for STMicroelectronics NFC Transceiver
"ST95HF". This release of driver supports ST95HF in initiator
role to read/write ISO14443 Type 4A, ISO14443 Type 4B and
ISO15693 Type5 tags.
The web link of ST95HF datasheet is:
http://www.st.com/web/en/resource/technical/document/datasheet/DM00102056.pdf

Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh <shikha.singh@st.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/Kconfig         |    1 +
 drivers/nfc/Makefile        |    1 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig  |   10 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile |    6 +
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c   | 1273 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c    |  167 ++++++
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h    |   64 +++
 7 files changed, 1522 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/Kconfig b/drivers/nfc/Kconfig
index 0d6003d..7437c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/nfc/Kconfig
@@ -76,4 +76,5 @@ source "drivers/nfc/st21nfca/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/nfc/st-nci/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig"
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/Makefile b/drivers/nfc/Makefile
index e362141..0a99e67 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/nfc/Makefile
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_ST21NFCA)  	+= st21nfca/
 obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_ST_NCI)	+= st-nci/
 obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_NXP_NCI)	+= nxp-nci/
 obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_S3FWRN5)	+= s3fwrn5/
+obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_ST95HF)	+= st95hf/
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..224f266
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+config NFC_ST95HF
+	tristate "ST95HF NFC Transceiver driver"
+	depends on SPI && NFC_DIGITAL
+	help
+	This enables the ST NFC driver for ST95HF NFC transceiver.
+	This makes use of SPI framework to communicate with transceiver
+	and registered with NFC digital core to support Linux NFC framework.
+
+	Say Y here to compile support for ST NFC transceiver ST95HF
+	linux driver into the kernel or say M to compile it as module.
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..00760b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#
+# Makefile for STMicroelectronics NFC transceiver ST95HF
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_ST95HF)	+= st95hf.o
+st95hf-objs			:= spi.o core.o
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..526e342
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1273 @@
+/*
+ * --------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Driver for ST NFC Transceiver ST95HF
+ * --------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 STMicroelectronics Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/nfc.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <net/nfc/digital.h>
+#include <net/nfc/nfc.h>
+
+#include "spi.h"
+
+/* supported protocols */
+#define ST95HF_SUPPORTED_PROT		(NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_MASK | \
+					NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_B_MASK | \
+					NFC_PROTO_ISO15693_MASK)
+/* driver capabilities */
+#define ST95HF_CAPABILITIES		NFC_DIGITAL_DRV_CAPS_IN_CRC
+
+/* Command Send Interface */
+/* ST95HF_COMMAND_SEND CMD Ids */
+#define ECHO_CMD			0x55
+#define WRITE_REGISTER_CMD		0x9
+#define PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD		0x2
+#define SEND_RECEIVE_CMD		0x4
+
+/* Select protocol codes */
+#define ISO15693_PROTOCOL_CODE		0x1
+#define ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_CODE		0x2
+#define ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_CODE		0x3
+
+/*
+ * head room len is 3
+ * 1 byte for control byte
+ * 1 byte for cmd
+ * 1 byte for size
+ */
+#define ST95HF_HEADROOM_LEN		3
+
+/*
+ * tailroom is 1 for ISO14443A
+ * and 0 for ISO14443B/ISO15693,
+ * hence the max value 1 should be
+ * taken.
+ */
+#define ST95HF_TAILROOM_LEN		1
+
+/* Command Response interface */
+#define MAX_RESPONSE_BUFFER_SIZE	280
+#define ECHORESPONSE			0x55
+#define ST95HF_ERR_MASK			0xF
+#define ST95HF_TIMEOUT_ERROR		0x87
+#define ST95HF_NFCA_CRC_ERR_MASK	0x20
+#define ST95HF_NFCB_CRC_ERR_MASK	0x01
+
+/* ST95HF transmission flag values */
+#define TRFLAG_NFCA_SHORT_FRAME		0x07
+#define TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME		0x08
+#define TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME_CRC	0x28
+
+/* Misc defs */
+#define HIGH				1
+#define LOW				0
+#define ISO14443A_RATS_REQ		0xE0
+#define RATS_TB1_PRESENT_MASK		0x20
+#define RATS_TA1_PRESENT_MASK		0x10
+#define TB1_FWI_MASK			0xF0
+#define WTX_REQ_FROM_TAG		0xF2
+
+#define MAX_CMD_LEN			0x7
+
+#define MAX_CMD_PARAMS			4
+struct cmd {
+	int cmd_len;
+	unsigned char cmd_id;
+	unsigned char no_cmd_params;
+	unsigned char cmd_params[MAX_CMD_PARAMS];
+	enum req_type req;
+};
+
+struct param_list {
+	int param_offset;
+	int new_param_val;
+};
+
+/*
+ * List of top-level cmds to be used internally by the driver.
+ * All these commands are build on top of ST95HF basic commands
+ * such as SEND_RECEIVE_CMD, PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD, etc.
+ * These top level cmds are used internally while implementing various ops of
+ * digital layer/driver probe or extending the digital framework layer for
+ * features that are not yet implemented there, for example, WTX cmd handling.
+ */
+enum st95hf_cmd_list {
+	CMD_ECHO,
+	CMD_ISO14443A_CONFIG,
+	CMD_ISO14443A_DEMOGAIN,
+	CMD_ISO14443B_DEMOGAIN,
+	CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+	CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+	CMD_WTX_RESPONSE,
+	CMD_FIELD_OFF,
+	CMD_ISO15693_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+};
+
+static const struct cmd cmd_array[] = {
+	[CMD_ECHO] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x2,
+		.cmd_id = ECHO_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0,
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO14443A_CONFIG] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x7,
+		.cmd_id = WRITE_REGISTER_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x4,
+		.cmd_params = {0x3A, 0x00, 0x5A, 0x04},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO14443A_DEMOGAIN] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x7,
+		.cmd_id = WRITE_REGISTER_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x4,
+		.cmd_params = {0x68, 0x01, 0x01, 0xDF},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO14443B_DEMOGAIN] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x7,
+		.cmd_id = WRITE_REGISTER_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x4,
+		.cmd_params = {0x68, 0x01, 0x01, 0x51},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x7,
+		.cmd_id = PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x4,
+		.cmd_params = {ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_CODE, 0x00, 0x01, 0xA0},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x7,
+		.cmd_id = PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x4,
+		.cmd_params = {ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_CODE, 0x01, 0x03, 0xFF},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_WTX_RESPONSE] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x6,
+		.cmd_id = SEND_RECEIVE_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x3,
+		.cmd_params = {0xF2, 0x00, TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME_CRC},
+		.req = ASYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_FIELD_OFF] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x5,
+		.cmd_id = PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x2,
+		.cmd_params = {0x0, 0x0},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+	[CMD_ISO15693_PROTOCOL_SELECT] = {
+		.cmd_len = 0x5,
+		.cmd_id = PROTOCOL_SELECT_CMD,
+		.no_cmd_params = 0x2,
+		.cmd_params = {ISO15693_PROTOCOL_CODE, 0x0D},
+		.req = SYNC,
+	},
+};
+
+/* st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg stores client context */
+struct st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg {
+	struct sk_buff *skb_resp;
+	nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t complete_cb;
+	void *cb_usrarg;
+	bool rats;
+};
+
+/*
+ * structure containing ST95HF driver specific data.
+ * @spicontext: structure containing information required
+ *	for spi communication between st95hf and host.
+ * @ddev: nfc digital device object.
+ * @nfcdev: nfc device object.
+ * @enable_gpio: gpio used to enable st95hf transceiver.
+ * @complete_cb_arg: structure to store various context information
+ *	that is passed from nfc requesting thread to the threaded ISR.
+ * @st95hf_supply: regulator "consumer" for NFC device.
+ * @sendrcv_trflag: last byte of frame send by sendrecv command
+ *	of st95hf. This byte contains transmission flag info.
+ * @exchange_lock: semaphore used for signaling the st95hf_remove
+ *	function that the last outstanding async nfc request is finished.
+ * @rm_lock: mutex for ensuring safe access of nfc digital object
+ *	from threaded ISR. Usage of this mutex avoids any race between
+ *	deletion of the object from st95hf_remove() and its access from
+ *	the threaded ISR.
+ * @nfcdev_free: flag to have the state of nfc device object.
+ *	[alive | died]
+ * @current_protocol: current nfc protocol.
+ * @current_rf_tech: current rf technology.
+ * @fwi: frame waiting index, received in reply of RATS according to
+ *	digital protocol.
+ */
+struct st95hf_context {
+	struct st95hf_spi_context spicontext;
+	struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev;
+	struct nfc_dev *nfcdev;
+	unsigned int enable_gpio;
+	struct st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg complete_cb_arg;
+	struct regulator *st95hf_supply;
+	unsigned char sendrcv_trflag;
+	struct semaphore exchange_lock;
+	struct mutex rm_lock;
+	bool nfcdev_free;
+	u8 current_protocol;
+	u8 current_rf_tech;
+	int fwi;
+};
+
+/*
+ * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
+ * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
+ * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
+ * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
+ * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
+ * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
+ * of the caller.
+ */
+static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
+				enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
+				int no_modif,
+				struct param_list *list_array,
+				bool recv_res)
+{
+	unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
+	int i, ret;
+	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
+
+	if (cmd_array[cmd].cmd_len > MAX_CMD_LEN)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (cmd_array[cmd].no_cmd_params < no_modif)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (no_modif && !list_array)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	spi_cmd_buffer[0] = ST95HF_COMMAND_SEND;
+	spi_cmd_buffer[1] = cmd_array[cmd].cmd_id;
+	spi_cmd_buffer[2] = cmd_array[cmd].no_cmd_params;
+
+	memcpy(&spi_cmd_buffer[3], cmd_array[cmd].cmd_params,
+	       spi_cmd_buffer[2]);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < no_modif; i++) {
+		if (list_array[i].param_offset >= cmd_array[cmd].no_cmd_params)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		spi_cmd_buffer[3 + list_array[i].param_offset] =
+						list_array[i].new_param_val;
+	}
+
+	ret = st95hf_spi_send(&st95context->spicontext,
+			      spi_cmd_buffer,
+			      cmd_array[cmd].cmd_len,
+			      cmd_array[cmd].req);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "st95hf_spi_send failed with error %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (cmd_array[cmd].req == SYNC && recv_res) {
+		unsigned char st95hf_response_arr[2];
+
+		ret = st95hf_spi_recv_response(&st95context->spicontext,
+					       st95hf_response_arr);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "spi error from st95hf_spi_recv_response(), err = 0x%x\n",
+				ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		if (st95hf_response_arr[0]) {
+			dev_err(dev, "st95hf error from st95hf_spi_recv_response(), err = 0x%x\n",
+				st95hf_response_arr[0]);
+			return -EIO;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_echo_command(struct st95hf_context *st95context)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	unsigned char echo_response;
+
+	result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(st95context, CMD_ECHO, 0, NULL, false);
+	if (result)
+		return result;
+
+	/* If control reached here, response can be taken */
+	result = st95hf_spi_recv_echo_res(&st95context->spicontext,
+					  &echo_response);
+	if (result) {
+		dev_err(&st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev,
+			"err: echo response receieve error = 0x%x\n", result);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	if (echo_response == ECHORESPONSE)
+		return 0;
+
+	dev_err(&st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev, "err: echo res is 0x%x\n",
+		echo_response);
+
+	return -EIO;
+}
+
+static int secondary_configuration_type4a(struct st95hf_context *stcontext)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	struct device *dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	/* 14443A config setting after select protocol */
+	result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+				      CMD_ISO14443A_CONFIG,
+				      0,
+				      NULL,
+				      true);
+	if (result) {
+		dev_err(dev, "type a config cmd, err = 0x%x\n", result);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	/* 14443A demo gain setting */
+	result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+				      CMD_ISO14443A_DEMOGAIN,
+				      0,
+				      NULL,
+				      true);
+	if (result)
+		dev_err(dev, "type a demogain cmd, err = 0x%x\n", result);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static int secondary_configuration_type4b(struct st95hf_context *stcontext)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	struct device *dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+				      CMD_ISO14443B_DEMOGAIN,
+				      0,
+				      NULL,
+				      true);
+	if (result)
+		dev_err(dev, "type b demogain cmd, err = 0x%x\n", result);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_select_protocol(struct st95hf_context *stcontext, int type)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	switch (type) {
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
+		stcontext->current_rf_tech = NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A;
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+					      CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+					      0,
+					      NULL,
+					      true);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "protocol sel, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+
+		/* secondary config. for 14443Type 4A after protocol select */
+		result = secondary_configuration_type4a(stcontext);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "type a secondary config, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+		break;
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B:
+		stcontext->current_rf_tech = NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B;
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+					      CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+					      0,
+					      NULL,
+					      true);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "protocol sel send, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * delay of 5-6 ms is required after select protocol
+		 * command in case of ISO14443 Type B
+		 */
+		usleep_range(50000, 60000);
+
+		/* secondary config. for 14443Type 4B after protocol select */
+		result = secondary_configuration_type4b(stcontext);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "type b secondary config, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+		break;
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693:
+		stcontext->current_rf_tech = NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693;
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+					      CMD_ISO15693_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+					      0,
+					      NULL,
+					      true);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "protocol sel send, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void st95hf_send_st95enable_negativepulse(struct st95hf_context *st95con)
+{
+	/* First make irq_in pin high */
+	gpio_set_value(st95con->enable_gpio, HIGH);
+
+	/* wait for 1 milisecond */
+	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+
+	/* Make irq_in pin low */
+	gpio_set_value(st95con->enable_gpio, LOW);
+
+	/* wait for minimum interrupt pulse to make st95 active */
+	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+
+	/* At end make it high */
+	gpio_set_value(st95con->enable_gpio, HIGH);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Send a reset sequence over SPI bus (Reset command + wait 3ms +
+ * negative pulse on st95hf enable gpio
+ */
+static int st95hf_send_spi_reset_sequence(struct st95hf_context *st95context)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	unsigned char reset_cmd = ST95HF_COMMAND_RESET;
+
+	result = st95hf_spi_send(&st95context->spicontext,
+				 &reset_cmd,
+				 ST95HF_RESET_CMD_LEN,
+				 ASYNC);
+	if (result) {
+		dev_err(&st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev,
+			"spi reset sequence cmd error = %d", result);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	/* wait for 3 milisecond to complete the controller reset process */
+	usleep_range(3000, 4000);
+
+	/* send negative pulse to make st95hf active */
+	st95hf_send_st95enable_negativepulse(st95context);
+
+	/* wait for 10 milisecond : HFO setup time */
+	usleep_range(10000, 20000);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_por_sequence(struct st95hf_context *st95context)
+{
+	int nth_attempt = 1;
+	int result;
+
+	st95hf_send_st95enable_negativepulse(st95context);
+
+	usleep_range(5000, 6000);
+	do {
+		/* send an ECHO command and checks ST95HF response */
+		result = st95hf_echo_command(st95context);
+
+		dev_dbg(&st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev,
+			"response from echo function = 0x%x, attempt = %d\n",
+			result, nth_attempt);
+
+		if (!result)
+			return 0;
+
+		/* send an pulse on IRQ in case of the chip is on sleep state */
+		if (nth_attempt == 2)
+			st95hf_send_st95enable_negativepulse(st95context);
+		else
+			st95hf_send_spi_reset_sequence(st95context);
+
+		/* delay of 50 milisecond */
+		usleep_range(50000, 51000);
+	} while (nth_attempt++ < 3);
+
+	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+static int iso14443_config_fdt(struct st95hf_context *st95context, int wtxm)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
+	struct nfc_digital_dev *nfcddev = st95context->ddev;
+	unsigned char pp_typeb;
+	struct param_list new_params[2];
+
+	pp_typeb = cmd_array[CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT].cmd_params[2];
+
+	if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443 &&
+	    st95context->fwi < 4)
+		st95context->fwi = 4;
+
+	new_params[0].param_offset = 2;
+	if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443)
+		new_params[0].new_param_val = st95context->fwi;
+	else if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_B)
+		new_params[0].new_param_val = pp_typeb;
+
+	new_params[1].param_offset = 3;
+	new_params[1].new_param_val = wtxm;
+
+	switch (nfcddev->curr_protocol) {
+	case NFC_PROTO_ISO14443:
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(st95context,
+					      CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+					      2,
+					      new_params,
+					      true);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "WTX type a sel proto, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+
+		/* secondary config. for 14443Type 4A after protocol select */
+		result = secondary_configuration_type4a(st95context);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "WTX type a second. config, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+		break;
+	case NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_B:
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(st95context,
+					      CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT,
+					      2,
+					      new_params,
+					      true);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "WTX type b sel proto, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+
+		/* secondary config. for 14443Type 4B after protocol select */
+		result = secondary_configuration_type4b(st95context);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "WTX type b second. config, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_handle_wtx(struct st95hf_context *stcontext,
+			     bool new_wtx,
+			     int wtx_val)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	unsigned char val_mm = 0;
+	struct param_list new_params[1];
+	struct nfc_digital_dev *nfcddev = stcontext->ddev;
+	struct device *dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	if (new_wtx) {
+		result = iso14443_config_fdt(stcontext, wtx_val & 0x3f);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Config. setting error on WTX req, err = 0x%x\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+
+		/* Send response of wtx with ASYNC as no response expected */
+		new_params[0].param_offset = 1;
+		new_params[0].new_param_val = wtx_val;
+
+		result = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext,
+					      CMD_WTX_RESPONSE,
+					      1,
+					      new_params,
+					      false);
+		if (result)
+			dev_err(dev, "WTX response send, err = 0x%x\n", result);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	/* if no new wtx, cofigure with default values */
+	if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443)
+		val_mm = cmd_array[CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT].cmd_params[3];
+	else if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443_B)
+		val_mm = cmd_array[CMD_ISO14443B_PROTOCOL_SELECT].cmd_params[3];
+
+	result = iso14443_config_fdt(stcontext, val_mm);
+	if (result)
+		dev_err(dev, "Default config. setting error after WTX processing, err = 0x%x\n",
+			result);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_error_handling(struct st95hf_context *stcontext,
+				 struct sk_buff *skb_resp,
+				 int res_len)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	unsigned char error_byte;
+	struct device *dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	/* First check ST95HF specific error */
+	if (skb_resp->data[0] & ST95HF_ERR_MASK) {
+		if (skb_resp->data[0] == ST95HF_TIMEOUT_ERROR)
+			result = -ETIMEDOUT;
+		else
+			result = -EIO;
+	return  result;
+	}
+
+	/* Check for CRC err only if CRC is present in the tag response */
+	switch (stcontext->current_rf_tech) {
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
+		if (stcontext->sendrcv_trflag == TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME_CRC) {
+			error_byte = skb_resp->data[res_len - 3];
+			if (error_byte & ST95HF_NFCA_CRC_ERR_MASK) {
+				/* CRC error occurred */
+				dev_err(dev, "CRC error, byte received = 0x%x\n",
+					error_byte);
+				result = -EIO;
+			}
+		}
+		break;
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B:
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693:
+		error_byte = skb_resp->data[res_len - 1];
+		if (error_byte & ST95HF_NFCB_CRC_ERR_MASK) {
+			/* CRC error occurred */
+			dev_err(dev, "CRC error, byte received = 0x%x\n",
+				error_byte);
+			result = -EIO;
+		}
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_response_handler(struct st95hf_context *stcontext,
+				   struct sk_buff *skb_resp,
+				   int res_len)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	int skb_len;
+	unsigned char val_mm;
+	struct nfc_digital_dev *nfcddev = stcontext->ddev;
+	struct device *dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+	struct st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg *cb_arg;
+
+	cb_arg = &stcontext->complete_cb_arg;
+
+	/* Process the response */
+	skb_put(skb_resp, res_len);
+
+	/* Remove st95 header */
+	skb_pull(skb_resp, 2);
+
+	skb_len = skb_resp->len;
+
+	/* check if it is case of RATS request reply & FWI is present */
+	if (nfcddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443 && cb_arg->rats &&
+	    (skb_resp->data[1] & RATS_TB1_PRESENT_MASK)) {
+		if (skb_resp->data[1] & RATS_TA1_PRESENT_MASK)
+			stcontext->fwi =
+				(skb_resp->data[3] & TB1_FWI_MASK) >> 4;
+		else
+			stcontext->fwi =
+				(skb_resp->data[2] & TB1_FWI_MASK) >> 4;
+
+		val_mm = cmd_array[CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT].cmd_params[3];
+
+		result = iso14443_config_fdt(stcontext, val_mm);
+		if (result) {
+			dev_err(dev, "error in config_fdt to handle fwi of ATS, error=%d\n",
+				result);
+			return result;
+		}
+	}
+	cb_arg->rats = false;
+
+	/* Remove CRC bytes only if received frames data has an eod (CRC) */
+	switch (stcontext->current_rf_tech) {
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
+		if (stcontext->sendrcv_trflag == TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME_CRC)
+			skb_trim(skb_resp, (skb_len - 5));
+		else
+			skb_trim(skb_resp, (skb_len - 3));
+		break;
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B:
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693:
+		skb_trim(skb_resp, (skb_len - 3));
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t irq_handler(int irq, void  *st95hfcontext)
+{
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext  =
+		(struct st95hf_context *)st95hfcontext;
+
+	if (stcontext->spicontext.req_issync) {
+		complete(&stcontext->spicontext.done);
+		stcontext->spicontext.req_issync = false;
+		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	}
+
+	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t irq_thread_handler(int irq, void  *st95hfcontext)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	int res_len;
+	static bool wtx;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct device *spidevice;
+	struct nfc_digital_dev *nfcddev;
+	struct sk_buff *skb_resp;
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext  =
+		(struct st95hf_context *)st95hfcontext;
+	struct st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg *cb_arg;
+
+	spidevice = &stcontext->spicontext.spidev->dev;
+
+	/*
+	 * check semaphore, if not down() already, then we don't
+	 * know in which context the ISR is called and surely it
+	 * will be a bug. Note that down() of the semaphore is done
+	 * in the corresponding st95hf_in_send_cmd() and then
+	 * only this ISR should be called. ISR will up() the
+	 * semaphore before leaving. Hence when the ISR is called
+	 * the correct behaviour is down_trylock() should always
+	 * return 1 (indicating semaphore cant be taken and hence no
+	 * change in semaphore count).
+	 * If not, then we up() the semaphore and crash on
+	 * a BUG() !
+	 */
+	if (!down_trylock(&stcontext->exchange_lock)) {
+		dev_err(spidevice, "unknown context in ST95HF ISR\n");
+		up(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+		BUG();
+	}
+
+	cb_arg = &stcontext->complete_cb_arg;
+	skb_resp = cb_arg->skb_resp;
+
+	mutex_lock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+	res_len = st95hf_spi_recv_response(&stcontext->spicontext,
+					   skb_resp->data);
+	if (res_len < 0) {
+		dev_err(spidevice, "TISR spi response err = 0x%x\n", res_len);
+		result = res_len;
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	/* if stcontext->nfcdev_free is true, it means remove already ran */
+	if (stcontext->nfcdev_free) {
+		result = -ENODEV;
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+	nfcddev = stcontext->ddev;
+	if (skb_resp->data[2] == WTX_REQ_FROM_TAG) {
+		/* Request for new FWT from tag */
+		result = st95hf_handle_wtx(stcontext, true, skb_resp->data[3]);
+		if (result)
+			goto end;
+
+		wtx = true;
+		mutex_unlock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	}
+
+	result = st95hf_error_handling(stcontext, skb_resp, res_len);
+	if (result)
+		goto end;
+
+	result = st95hf_response_handler(stcontext, skb_resp, res_len);
+	if (result)
+		goto end;
+
+	/*
+	 * If select protocol is done on wtx req. do select protocol
+	 * again with default values
+	 */
+	if (wtx) {
+		wtx = false;
+		result = st95hf_handle_wtx(stcontext, false, 0);
+		if (result)
+			goto end;
+	}
+
+	/* call digital layer callback */
+	cb_arg->complete_cb(stcontext->ddev, cb_arg->cb_usrarg, skb_resp);
+
+	/* up the semaphore before returning */
+	up(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
+end:
+	kfree_skb(skb_resp);
+	wtx = false;
+	cb_arg->rats = false;
+	skb_resp = ERR_PTR(result);
+	/* call of callback with error */
+	cb_arg->complete_cb(stcontext->ddev, cb_arg->cb_usrarg, skb_resp);
+	/* up the semaphore before returning */
+	up(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+/* NFC ops functions definition */
+static int st95hf_in_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
+				  int type,
+				  int param)
+{
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+
+	if (type == NFC_DIGITAL_CONFIG_RF_TECH)
+		return st95hf_select_protocol(stcontext, param);
+
+	if (type == NFC_DIGITAL_CONFIG_FRAMING) {
+		switch (param) {
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCA_SHORT:
+			stcontext->sendrcv_trflag = TRFLAG_NFCA_SHORT_FRAME;
+			break;
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCA_STANDARD:
+			stcontext->sendrcv_trflag = TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME;
+			break;
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCA_T4T:
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCA_NFC_DEP:
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCA_STANDARD_WITH_CRC_A:
+			stcontext->sendrcv_trflag = TRFLAG_NFCA_STD_FRAME_CRC;
+			break;
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFCB:
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_ISO15693_INVENTORY:
+		case NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_ISO15693_T5T:
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rf_off(struct st95hf_context *stcontext)
+{
+	int rc;
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	dev = &stcontext->nfcdev->dev;
+
+	rc = st95hf_send_recv_cmd(stcontext, CMD_FIELD_OFF, 0, NULL, true);
+	if (rc)
+		dev_err(dev, "protocol sel send field off, err = 0x%x\n", rc);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
+			      struct sk_buff *skb,
+			      u16 timeout,
+			      nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb,
+			      void *arg)
+{
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+	int rc;
+	struct sk_buff *skb_resp;
+	int len_data_to_tag = 0;
+
+	skb_resp = nfc_alloc_recv_skb(MAX_RESPONSE_BUFFER_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!skb_resp) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error;
+	}
+
+	switch (stcontext->current_rf_tech) {
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
+		len_data_to_tag = skb->len + 1;
+		*skb_put(skb, 1) = stcontext->sendrcv_trflag;
+		break;
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B:
+	case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693:
+		len_data_to_tag = skb->len;
+		break;
+	default:
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+		goto free_skb_resp;
+	}
+
+	skb_push(skb, 3);
+	skb->data[0] = ST95HF_COMMAND_SEND;
+	skb->data[1] = SEND_RECEIVE_CMD;
+	skb->data[2] = len_data_to_tag;
+
+	stcontext->complete_cb_arg.skb_resp = skb_resp;
+	stcontext->complete_cb_arg.cb_usrarg = arg;
+	stcontext->complete_cb_arg.complete_cb = cb;
+
+	if ((skb->data[3] == ISO14443A_RATS_REQ) &&
+	    ddev->curr_protocol == NFC_PROTO_ISO14443)
+		stcontext->complete_cb_arg.rats = true;
+
+	/*
+	 * down the semaphore to indicate to remove func that an
+	 * ISR is pending, note that it will not block here in any case.
+	 * If found blocked, it is a BUG!
+	 */
+	rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+	if (rc) {
+		dev_err(&stcontext->nfcdev->dev, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
+		BUG();
+	}
+
+	rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
+			     skb->len,
+			     ASYNC);
+	if (rc) {
+		dev_err(&stcontext->nfcdev->dev,
+			"Error %d trying to perform data_exchange", rc);
+		/* up the semaphore since ISR will never come in this case */
+		up(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+		goto free_skb_resp;
+	}
+
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+
+	return rc;
+
+free_skb_resp:
+	kfree_skb(skb_resp);
+error:
+	return rc;
+}
+
+/* p2p will be supported in a later release ! */
+static int st95hf_tg_configure_hw(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
+				  int type,
+				  int param)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_tg_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
+			      struct sk_buff *skb,
+			      u16 timeout,
+			      nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb,
+			      void *arg)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_tg_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
+			    u16 timeout,
+			    nfc_digital_cmd_complete_t cb,
+			    void *arg)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_tg_get_rf_tech(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u8 *rf_tech)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_switch_rf(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, bool on)
+{
+	u8 rf_tech;
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext = nfc_digital_get_drvdata(ddev);
+
+	rf_tech = ddev->curr_rf_tech;
+
+	if (on)
+		/* switch on RF field */
+		return st95hf_select_protocol(stcontext, rf_tech);
+
+	/* switch OFF RF field */
+	return rf_off(stcontext);
+}
+
+/* TODO st95hf_abort_cmd */
+static void st95hf_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
+{
+}
+
+static struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
+	.in_configure_hw = st95hf_in_configure_hw,
+	.in_send_cmd = st95hf_in_send_cmd,
+
+	.tg_listen = st95hf_tg_listen,
+	.tg_configure_hw = st95hf_tg_configure_hw,
+	.tg_send_cmd = st95hf_tg_send_cmd,
+	.tg_get_rf_tech = st95hf_tg_get_rf_tech,
+
+	.switch_rf = st95hf_switch_rf,
+	.abort_cmd = st95hf_abort_cmd,
+};
+
+static const struct spi_device_id st95hf_id[] = {
+	{ "st95hf", 0 },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st95hf_id);
+
+static int st95hf_probe(struct spi_device *nfc_spi_dev)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	struct st95hf_context *st95context;
+	struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext;
+
+	nfc_info(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "ST95HF driver probe called.\n");
+
+	st95context = devm_kzalloc(&nfc_spi_dev->dev,
+				   sizeof(struct st95hf_context),
+				   GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!st95context)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	spicontext = &st95context->spicontext;
+
+	spicontext->spidev = nfc_spi_dev;
+
+	st95context->fwi =
+		cmd_array[CMD_ISO14443A_PROTOCOL_SELECT].cmd_params[2];
+
+	if (device_property_present(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "st95hfvin")) {
+		st95context->st95hf_supply =
+			devm_regulator_get(&nfc_spi_dev->dev,
+					   "st95hfvin");
+		if (IS_ERR(st95context->st95hf_supply)) {
+			dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "failed to acquire regulator\n");
+			return PTR_ERR(st95context->st95hf_supply);
+		}
+
+		ret = regulator_enable(st95context->st95hf_supply);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "failed to enable regulator\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	init_completion(&spicontext->done);
+	mutex_init(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * Store spicontext in spi device object for using it in
+	 * remove function
+	 */
+	dev_set_drvdata(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, spicontext);
+
+	st95context->enable_gpio =
+		of_get_named_gpio(nfc_spi_dev->dev.of_node,
+				  "enable-gpio",
+				  0);
+	if (!gpio_is_valid(st95context->enable_gpio)) {
+		dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "No valid enable gpio\n");
+		ret = st95context->enable_gpio;
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, st95context->enable_gpio,
+				    GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_HIGH,
+				    "enable_gpio");
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+
+	if (nfc_spi_dev->irq > 0) {
+		if (devm_request_threaded_irq(&nfc_spi_dev->dev,
+					      nfc_spi_dev->irq,
+					      irq_handler,
+					      irq_thread_handler,
+					      IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+					      "st95hf",
+					      (void *)st95context) < 0) {
+			dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "err: irq request for st95hf is failed\n");
+			ret =  -EINVAL;
+			goto err_disable_regulator;
+		}
+	} else {
+		dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "not a valid IRQ associated with ST95HF\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * First reset SPI to handle warm reset of the system.
+	 * It will put the ST95HF device in Power ON state
+	 * which make the state of device identical to state
+	 * at the time of cold reset of the system.
+	 */
+	ret = st95hf_send_spi_reset_sequence(st95context);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "err: spi_reset_sequence failed\n");
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+	}
+
+	/* call PowerOnReset sequence of ST95hf to activate it */
+	ret = st95hf_por_sequence(st95context);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&nfc_spi_dev->dev, "err: por seq failed for st95hf\n");
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+	}
+
+	/* create NFC dev object and register with NFC Subsystem */
+	st95context->ddev = nfc_digital_allocate_device(&st95hf_nfc_digital_ops,
+							ST95HF_SUPPORTED_PROT,
+							ST95HF_CAPABILITIES,
+							ST95HF_HEADROOM_LEN,
+							ST95HF_TAILROOM_LEN);
+	if (!st95context->ddev) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_disable_regulator;
+	}
+
+	st95context->nfcdev = st95context->ddev->nfc_dev;
+	nfc_digital_set_parent_dev(st95context->ddev, &nfc_spi_dev->dev);
+
+	ret =  nfc_digital_register_device(st95context->ddev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&st95context->nfcdev->dev, "st95hf registration failed\n");
+		goto err_free_digital_device;
+	}
+
+	/* store st95context in nfc device object */
+	nfc_digital_set_drvdata(st95context->ddev, st95context);
+
+	sema_init(&st95context->exchange_lock, 1);
+	mutex_init(&st95context->rm_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+
+err_free_digital_device:
+	nfc_digital_free_device(st95context->ddev);
+err_disable_regulator:
+	if (st95context->st95hf_supply)
+		regulator_disable(st95context->st95hf_supply);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int st95hf_remove(struct spi_device *nfc_spi_dev)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	unsigned char reset_cmd = ST95HF_COMMAND_RESET;
+	struct st95hf_spi_context *spictx = dev_get_drvdata(&nfc_spi_dev->dev);
+
+	struct st95hf_context *stcontext = container_of(spictx,
+							struct st95hf_context,
+							spicontext);
+
+	mutex_lock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+
+	nfc_digital_unregister_device(stcontext->ddev);
+	nfc_digital_free_device(stcontext->ddev);
+	stcontext->nfcdev_free = true;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&stcontext->rm_lock);
+
+	/* if last in_send_cmd's ISR is pending, wait for it to finish */
+	result = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
+	if (result == -EINTR)
+		dev_err(&spictx->spidev->dev, "sleep for semaphore interrupted by signal\n");
+
+	/* next reset the ST95HF controller */
+	result = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext,
+				 &reset_cmd,
+				 ST95HF_RESET_CMD_LEN,
+				 ASYNC);
+	if (result) {
+		dev_err(&spictx->spidev->dev,
+			"ST95HF reset failed in remove() err = %d\n", result);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	/* wait for 3 ms to complete the controller reset process */
+	usleep_range(3000, 4000);
+
+	/* disable regulator */
+	if (stcontext->st95hf_supply)
+		regulator_disable(stcontext->st95hf_supply);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+/* Register as SPI protocol driver */
+static struct spi_driver st95hf_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "st95hf",
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.id_table = st95hf_id,
+	.probe = st95hf_probe,
+	.remove = st95hf_remove,
+};
+
+module_spi_driver(st95hf_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Shikha Singh <shikha.singh@st.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ST NFC Transceiver ST95HF driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e2d3bbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/*
+ * ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c function definitions for SPI communication
+ * ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 STMicroelectronics Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include "spi.h"
+
+/* Function to send user provided buffer to ST95HF through SPI */
+int st95hf_spi_send(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+		    unsigned char *buffertx,
+		    int datalen,
+		    enum req_type reqtype)
+{
+	struct spi_message m;
+	int result = 0;
+	struct spi_device *spidev = spicontext->spidev;
+	struct spi_transfer tx_transfer = {
+		.tx_buf = buffertx,
+		.len = datalen,
+	};
+
+	mutex_lock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	if (reqtype == SYNC) {
+		spicontext->req_issync = true;
+		reinit_completion(&spicontext->done);
+	} else {
+		spicontext->req_issync = false;
+	}
+
+	spi_message_init(&m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&tx_transfer, &m);
+
+	result = spi_sync(spidev, &m);
+	if (result) {
+		dev_err(&spidev->dev, "error: sending cmd to st95hf using SPI = %d\n",
+			result);
+		mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+		return result;
+	}
+
+	/* return for asynchronous or no-wait case */
+	if (reqtype == ASYNC) {
+		mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	result = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spicontext->done,
+					     msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+	/* check for timeout or success */
+	if (!result) {
+		dev_err(&spidev->dev, "error: response not ready timeout\n");
+		result = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	} else {
+		result = 0;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	return result;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st95hf_spi_send);
+
+/* Function to Receive command Response */
+int st95hf_spi_recv_response(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+			     unsigned char *receivebuff)
+{
+	int len = 0;
+	struct spi_transfer tx_takedata;
+	struct spi_message m;
+	struct spi_device *spidev = spicontext->spidev;
+	unsigned char readdata_cmd = ST95HF_COMMAND_RECEIVE;
+	struct spi_transfer t[2] = {
+		{.tx_buf = &readdata_cmd, .len = 1,},
+		{.rx_buf = receivebuff, .len = 2, .cs_change = 1,},
+	};
+
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	memset(&tx_takedata, 0x0, sizeof(struct spi_transfer));
+
+	mutex_lock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	/* First spi transfer to know the length of valid data */
+	spi_message_init(&m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
+
+	ret = spi_sync(spidev, &m);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&spidev->dev, "spi_recv_resp, data length error = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* As 2 bytes are already read */
+	len = 2;
+
+	/* Support of long frame */
+	if (receivebuff[0] & 0x60)
+		len += (((receivebuff[0] & 0x60) >> 5) << 8) | receivebuff[1];
+	else
+		len += receivebuff[1];
+
+	/* Now make a transfer to read only relevant bytes */
+	tx_takedata.rx_buf = &receivebuff[2];
+	tx_takedata.len = len - 2;
+
+	spi_message_init(&m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&tx_takedata, &m);
+
+	ret = spi_sync(spidev, &m);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&spidev->dev, "spi_recv_resp, data read error = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return len;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st95hf_spi_recv_response);
+
+int st95hf_spi_recv_echo_res(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+			     unsigned char *receivebuff)
+{
+	unsigned char readdata_cmd = ST95HF_COMMAND_RECEIVE;
+	struct spi_transfer t[2] = {
+		{.tx_buf = &readdata_cmd, .len = 1,},
+		{.rx_buf = receivebuff, .len = 1,},
+	};
+	struct spi_message m;
+	struct spi_device *spidev = spicontext->spidev;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	spi_message_init(&m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
+	spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
+	ret = spi_sync(spidev, &m);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
+
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(&spidev->dev, "recv_echo_res, data read error = %d\n",
+			ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st95hf_spi_recv_echo_res);
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..552d220
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h functions declarations for SPI communication
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 STMicroelectronics – All Rights Reserved
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_ST95HF_SPI_H
+#define __LINUX_ST95HF_SPI_H
+
+#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
+
+/* Basic ST95HF SPI CMDs */
+#define ST95HF_COMMAND_SEND	0x0
+#define ST95HF_COMMAND_RESET	0x1
+#define ST95HF_COMMAND_RECEIVE	0x2
+
+#define ST95HF_RESET_CMD_LEN	0x1
+
+/*
+ * structure to contain st95hf spi communication specific information.
+ * @req_issync: true for synchronous calls.
+ * @spidev: st95hf spi device object.
+ * @done: completion structure to wait for st95hf response
+ *	for synchronous calls.
+ * @spi_lock: mutex to allow only one spi transfer at a time.
+ */
+struct st95hf_spi_context {
+	bool req_issync;
+	struct spi_device *spidev;
+	struct completion done;
+	struct mutex spi_lock;
+};
+
+/* flag to differentiate synchronous & asynchronous spi request */
+enum req_type {
+	SYNC,
+	ASYNC,
+};
+
+int st95hf_spi_send(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+		    unsigned char *buffertx,
+		    int datalen,
+		    enum req_type reqtype);
+
+int st95hf_spi_recv_response(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+			     unsigned char *receivebuff);
+
+int st95hf_spi_recv_echo_res(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
+			     unsigned char *receivebuff);
+
+#endif
-- 
1.8.2.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 3/3] DT: bindings: net: nfc: Add ST95HF binding doc
  2015-11-20 11:40 [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 0/3] *** ST95HF driver v5 *** Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 1/3] NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support Shikha Singh
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support Shikha Singh
@ 2015-11-20 11:40 ` Shikha Singh
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shikha Singh @ 2015-11-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sameo, aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc
  Cc: raunaque.quaiser, manoj.kumar, sylvain.fidelis, patrick.sohn,
	shikha.singh, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

This patch includes ST95HF binding doc that guides how to
make node entry of ST95HF in DT file of any platform.

Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh <shikha.singh@st.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt         | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ea3178b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/st95hf.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+* STMicroelectronics : NFC Transceiver ST95HF
+
+ST NFC Transceiver is required to attach with SPI bus.
+ST95HF node should be defined in DT as SPI slave device of SPI
+master with which ST95HF transceiver is physically connected.
+The properties defined below are required to be the part of DT
+to include ST95HF transceiver into the platform.
+
+Required properties:
+===================
+- reg: Address of SPI slave "ST95HF transceiver" on SPI master bus.
+
+- compatible: should be "st,st95hf" for ST95HF NFC transceiver
+
+- spi-max-frequency: Max. operating SPI frequency for ST95HF
+	transceiver.
+
+- enable-gpio: GPIO line to enable ST95HF transceiver.
+
+- interrupt-parent : Standard way to specify the controller to which
+	ST95HF transceiver's interrupt is routed.
+
+- interrupts : Standard way to define ST95HF transceiver's out
+	interrupt.
+
+Optional property:
+=================
+- st95hfvin-supply : This is an optional property. It contains a
+	phandle to ST95HF transceiver's regulator supply node in DT.
+
+Example:
+=======
+spi@9840000 {
+	reg = <0x9840000 0x110>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
+	cs-gpios = <&pio0 4>;
+	status = "okay";
+
+	st95hf@0{
+		reg = <0>;
+		compatible = "st,st95hf";
+		status = "okay";
+		spi-max-frequency = <1000000>;
+		enable-gpio = <&pio4 0>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&pio0>;
+		interrupts = <7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+	};
+
+};
-- 
1.8.2.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support Shikha Singh
@ 2015-12-20 17:50   ` Samuel Ortiz
  2015-12-21 11:57     ` Shikha SINGH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2015-12-20 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shikha Singh
  Cc: aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc,
	raunaque.quaiser, manoj.kumar, sylvain.fidelis, patrick.sohn,
	MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

Hi Singh,

This looks a lot better than the initial version.
I only have one question:

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Shikha Singh wrote:
> +/*
> + * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
> + * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
> + * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
> + * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
> + * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
> + * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
> + * of the caller.
> + */
> +static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
> +				enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
> +				int no_modif,
> +				struct param_list *list_array,
> +				bool recv_res)
> +{
> +	unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
> +	int i, ret;
> +	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
How do you know this driver is still valid at that point ?
It seems to be a potential corner case against the driver's remove
function, but it seems to be a race nevertheless.

Cheers,
Samuel.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  2015-12-20 17:50   ` Samuel Ortiz
@ 2015-12-21 11:57     ` Shikha SINGH
  2015-12-21 22:45       ` Samuel Ortiz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shikha SINGH @ 2015-12-21 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Samuel Ortiz
  Cc: aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc,
	Raunaque Mujeeb QUAISER, Manoj KUMAR, Sylvain FIDELIS,
	Patrick SOHN, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

Hello Samuel,
	Please see my answer below.
	
>This looks a lot better than the initial version.
>I only have one question:
>
>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Shikha Singh wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
>> + * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
>> + * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
>> + * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
>> + * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
>> + * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
>> + * of the caller.
>> + */
>> +static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
>> +				enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
>> +				int no_modif,
>> +				struct param_list *list_array,
>> +				bool recv_res)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
>How do you know this driver is still valid at that point ?
>It seems to be a potential corner case against the driver's remove function, but
>it seems to be a race nevertheless.

st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is a static function that can be called only when a NFC digital request is submitted to our driver.
So in summary, it can be called either from an implemented NFC digital ops (such as st95hf_switch_rf()) or from the driver's threaded ISR.
Now if we see the remove function of the driver i.e. st95hf_remove(), it waits for all the outstanding NFC digital request to finish via nfc_digital_unregister_device(stcontext->ddev).

It also waits for any outstanding threaded ISR to finish using the semaphore mechanism:

        /* if last in_send_cmd's ISR is pending, wait for it to finish */
        result = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);

The spi device object is removed after st95hf_remove() finishes, but then we can't have any call to st95hf_send_recv_cmd() after st95hf_remove finishes !
Till st95hf_remove() finishes, there is no issue in calling spi functions/data structures (such as spi device) either in "parallel" from a different thread or called from st95hf_remove() itself.
So I don't think there is race condition.

Please let me know if you think there could still be a race condition here and also tell me the corresponding use-case (sequence of calls that could lead to such a race).

Thanks and BR,
Shikha


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  2015-12-21 11:57     ` Shikha SINGH
@ 2015-12-21 22:45       ` Samuel Ortiz
  2015-12-21 23:26         ` [linux-nfc] [ " Samuel Ortiz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2015-12-21 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shikha SINGH
  Cc: aloisio.almeida, lauro.venancio, linux-wireless, linux-nfc,
	Raunaque Mujeeb QUAISER, Manoj KUMAR, Sylvain FIDELIS,
	Patrick SOHN, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

Hi Shikha,

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:57:23PM +0800, Shikha SINGH wrote:
> Hello Samuel,
> 	Please see my answer below.
> 	
> >This looks a lot better than the initial version.
> >I only have one question:
> >
> >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Shikha Singh wrote:
> >> +/*
> >> + * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
> >> + * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
> >> + * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
> >> + * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
> >> + * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
> >> + * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
> >> + * of the caller.
> >> + */
> >> +static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
> >> +				enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
> >> +				int no_modif,
> >> +				struct param_list *list_array,
> >> +				bool recv_res)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
> >> +	int i, ret;
> >> +	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
> >How do you know this driver is still valid at that point ?
> >It seems to be a potential corner case against the driver's remove function, but
> >it seems to be a race nevertheless.
> 
> st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is a static function that can be called only when a NFC digital request is submitted to our driver.
> So in summary, it can be called either from an implemented NFC digital ops (such as st95hf_switch_rf()) or from the driver's threaded ISR.
> Now if we see the remove function of the driver i.e. st95hf_remove(), it waits for all the outstanding NFC digital request to finish via nfc_digital_unregister_device(stcontext->ddev).
>
Yes, that was my main concern but I forgot
nfc_digital_unregister_device() waits for its command workqueue to be
emptied before returning. So we're safe.

All 3 patches applied to nfc-next, thanks.

Cheers,
Samuel.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-nfc] [ PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support
  2015-12-21 22:45       ` Samuel Ortiz
@ 2015-12-21 23:26         ` Samuel Ortiz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2015-12-21 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shikha SINGH
  Cc: Manoj KUMAR, linux-nfc, Sylvain FIDELIS, linux-wireless,
	Patrick SOHN, MMS_MMY_Applications_SW

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45:35PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Shikha,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:57:23PM +0800, Shikha SINGH wrote:
> > Hello Samuel,
> > 	Please see my answer below.
> > 	
> > >This looks a lot better than the initial version.
> > >I only have one question:
> > >
> > >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Shikha Singh wrote:
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
> > >> + * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
> > >> + * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
> > >> + * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
> > >> + * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
> > >> + * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
> > >> + * of the caller.
> > >> + */
> > >> +static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
> > >> +				enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
> > >> +				int no_modif,
> > >> +				struct param_list *list_array,
> > >> +				bool recv_res)
> > >> +{
> > >> +	unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
> > >> +	int i, ret;
> > >> +	struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
> > >How do you know this driver is still valid at that point ?
> > >It seems to be a potential corner case against the driver's remove function, but
> > >it seems to be a race nevertheless.
> > 
> > st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is a static function that can be called only when a NFC digital request is submitted to our driver.
> > So in summary, it can be called either from an implemented NFC digital ops (such as st95hf_switch_rf()) or from the driver's threaded ISR.
> > Now if we see the remove function of the driver i.e. st95hf_remove(), it waits for all the outstanding NFC digital request to finish via nfc_digital_unregister_device(stcontext->ddev).
> >
> Yes, that was my main concern but I forgot
> nfc_digital_unregister_device() waits for its command workqueue to be
> emptied before returning. So we're safe.
> 
> All 3 patches applied to nfc-next, thanks.
Just a side note: I removed the 2 calls you had in your driver to BUG()
and replaced them with WARN() calls.
BUG() is really meant for unrecoverable system errors as it crashes the
machine. I don't think an NFC driver should call it.

Cheers,
Samuel.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-21 23:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-20 11:40 [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 0/3] *** ST95HF driver v5 *** Shikha Singh
2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 1/3] NFC: digital: Add Type4A tags support Shikha Singh
2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 2/3] driver: nfc: Add ST95HF NFC Transceiver support Shikha Singh
2015-12-20 17:50   ` Samuel Ortiz
2015-12-21 11:57     ` Shikha SINGH
2015-12-21 22:45       ` Samuel Ortiz
2015-12-21 23:26         ` [linux-nfc] [ " Samuel Ortiz
2015-11-20 11:40 ` [[linux-nfc] PATCH v5 3/3] DT: bindings: net: nfc: Add ST95HF binding doc Shikha Singh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.