From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] Btrfs: fix race when finishing dev replace leading to transaction abort
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:42:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448026955-10835-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448017261-15543-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org>
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
During the final phase of a device replace operation, I ran into a
transaction abort that resulted in the following trace:
[23919.655368] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 30175 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9843 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]()
[23919.664742] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[23919.665749] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 parport psmouse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_core evdev microcode pcspkr button serio_raw ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic ata_piix virtio_pci floppy virtio_ring libata e1000 virtio scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[23919.679442] CPU: 10 PID: 30175 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[23919.682392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[23919.689151] 0000000000000000 ffff8804020cbb50 ffffffff812566f4 ffff8804020cbb98
[23919.692604] ffff8804020cbb88 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa03eea69 ffff88041b678a48
[23919.694230] ffff88042ac38000 ffff88041b678930 00000000fffffffe ffff8804020cbbf0
[23919.696716] Call Trace:
[23919.698669] [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[23919.700597] [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8
[23919.701958] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.703612] [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50
[23919.705047] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.706967] [<ffffffffa0402097>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x2dd [btrfs]
[23919.708611] [<ffffffffa0402300>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[23919.710099] [<ffffffffa03ef0b8>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x121/0x28b [btrfs]
[23919.711970] [<ffffffffa0413025>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7d3/0xc6d [btrfs]
[23919.713602] [<ffffffff8108b78f>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[23919.714756] [<ffffffff81086dbc>] ? percpu_down_read+0x51/0x78
[23919.716155] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.718918] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.724170] [<ffffffff8116b579>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[23919.725482] [<ffffffff8117c1d7>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[23919.726790] [<ffffffff8117c5ef>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x406/0x4e6
[23919.728428] [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[23919.729642] [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[23919.730782] [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[23919.731847] [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[23919.733330] ---[ end trace 166ef301a335832a ]---
This is due to a race between device replace and chunk allocation, which
the following diagram illustrates:
CPU 1 CPU 2
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()
at this point
dev_replace->tgtdev->devid ==
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID (0ULL)
...
btrfs_start_transaction()
btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_fallocate()
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
btrfs_join_transaction()
--> starts a new transaction
do_chunk_alloc()
lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
btrfs_alloc_chunk()
--> creates extent map for
the new chunk with
em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
== X (X > 0)
--> extent map is added to
fs_info->mapping_tree
--> initial phase of bg A
allocation completes
unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex
lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree()
--> iterates fs_info->mapping_tree and
replaces the device in every extent
map's map->stripes[] with
dev_replace->tgtdev, which still has
an id of 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
btrfs_end_transaction()
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
--> starts final phase of
bg A creation (update device,
extent, and chunk trees, etc)
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
btrfs_update_device()
--> attempts to update a device
item with ID == 0ULL
(BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
which is the current ID of
bg A's
em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
--> doesn't find such item
returns -ENOENT
--> the device id should have been X
and not 0ULL
got -ENOENT from
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
and aborts current transaction
finishes setting up the target device,
namely it sets tgtdev->devid to the value
of srcdev->devid, which is X (and X > 0)
So fix this by taking the device list mutex when processing the chunk's
extent map stripes to update the device items.
This happened while running fstest btrfs/071.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
V2: Made the attribution of a new id from the old device to happen
after replacing the device for the extent maps with the new device,
as obviously it was missing before.
V3: Make it really race free. The previous approach was still racy, but in a
different way. Need to really synchronize the finishing phase of device
replace that sets up the new device with the final phase of chunk allocation
that processes the stripes and updates the device items.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 45f2025..ab55faf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4827,21 +4827,32 @@ int btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
goto out;
}
+ /*
+ * Take the device list mutex to prevent races with the final phase of
+ * a device replace operation that replaces the device object associated
+ * with the map's stripes, because the device object's id can change
+ * at any time during that final phase of the device replace operation
+ * (dev-replace.c:btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()).
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&chunk_root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
device = map->stripes[i].dev;
dev_offset = map->stripes[i].physical;
ret = btrfs_update_device(trans, device);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ break;
ret = btrfs_alloc_dev_extent(trans, device,
chunk_root->root_key.objectid,
BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID,
chunk_offset, dev_offset,
stripe_size);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ break;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&chunk_root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
stripe = &chunk->stripe;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
--
2.1.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 11:01 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race when finishing dev replace leading to transaction abort fdmanana
2015-11-20 12:16 ` [PATCH v2] " fdmanana
2015-11-20 13:42 ` fdmanana [this message]
2015-11-20 14:12 ` [PATCH v4] " fdmanana
2015-11-20 22:55 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448026955-10835-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.