From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 04:57:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448683025.6837.4.camel@scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$34543$2ed1f043$2f803125$884b36c0@cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 422 bytes --]
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 03:38 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> AFAIK, per-subvolume *atime mounts should already be working.
Ah I see. :)
Still, specifically for snapshots that's a bit unhandy, as one
typically doesn't mount each of them... one rather mount e.g. the top
level subvol and has a subdir snapshots there...
So perhaps the idea of having snapshots that are per se noatime is
still not too bad.
Cheers,
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5313 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-28 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 1:43 btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files Mitch Fossen
2015-11-23 6:29 ` Duncan
2015-11-25 21:49 ` Mitchell Fossen
2015-11-26 16:52 ` Duncan
2015-11-26 18:25 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 23:29 ` Duncan
2015-11-27 0:06 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-27 3:38 ` Duncan
2015-11-28 3:57 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2015-11-28 6:49 ` Duncan
2015-12-12 22:15 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-13 7:10 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 22:14 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 14:24 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-14 19:39 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 20:27 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-14 21:30 ` Lionel Bouton
2015-12-14 23:25 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-15 1:49 ` Duncan
2015-12-15 2:38 ` Lionel Bouton
2015-12-16 8:10 ` Duncan
2015-12-14 23:10 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 23:16 ` project idea: per-object default mount-options / more btrfs-properties / chattr attributes (was: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-15 2:08 ` btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files Duncan
2015-12-15 4:05 ` Chris Murphy
2015-11-27 1:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-23 12:59 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-26 0:23 ` [auto-]defrag, nodatacow - general suggestions?(was: btrfs: poor performance on deleting many large files?) Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 0:33 ` Hugo Mills
2015-12-09 5:43 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-09 13:36 ` Duncan
2015-12-14 2:46 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 11:19 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 23:39 ` Kai Krakow
2015-12-14 1:44 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-14 10:51 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 23:55 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-11-26 23:08 ` Duncan
2015-12-09 5:45 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-09 16:36 ` Duncan
2015-12-16 21:59 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-17 4:06 ` Duncan
2015-12-18 0:21 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-17 4:35 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 5:07 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 5:12 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 6:00 ` Duncan
2015-12-17 6:01 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448683025.6837.4.camel@scientia.net \
--to=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.