All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] gpiolib: return 0 or 1 in gpiod_get_value*() functions
@ 2015-11-30 17:30 ` Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro @ 2015-11-30 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio
  Cc: linux-kernel, linus.walleij, gnurou, jose.diazdegrenudepedro,
	hector.palacios

Commit 79a9becda894 moved the awareness of active low state
into the gpiod_get_value*() functions, but it only inverts the
GPIO's raw value when it is active low. If the GPIO is active
high, the gpiod_get_value*() functions return the raw value of
the register, which can be any positive value.

This patch does a double inversion when the GPIO is active high
to make sure either 0 or 1 is returned by these functions.

Signed-off-by: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro <Jose.DiazdeGrenudePedro@digi.com>
Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
---
change in v2:
 - add missing semicolon
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 50c4922fe53a..bd96f0457ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1981,9 +1981,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
-		value = !value;
-
-	return value;
+		return !value;
+	else
+		return !!value;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_value);
 
@@ -2224,9 +2224,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
-		value = !value;
-
-	return value;
+		return !value;
+	else
+		return !!value;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_value_cansleep);
 
-- 
2.6.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] gpiolib: return 0 or 1 in gpiod_get_value*() functions
@ 2015-11-30 17:30 ` Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro @ 2015-11-30 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio
  Cc: linux-kernel, linus.walleij, gnurou, jose.diazdegrenudepedro,
	hector.palacios

Commit 79a9becda894 moved the awareness of active low state
into the gpiod_get_value*() functions, but it only inverts the
GPIO's raw value when it is active low. If the GPIO is active
high, the gpiod_get_value*() functions return the raw value of
the register, which can be any positive value.

This patch does a double inversion when the GPIO is active high
to make sure either 0 or 1 is returned by these functions.

Signed-off-by: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro <Jose.DiazdeGrenudePedro@digi.com>
Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
---
change in v2:
 - add missing semicolon
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 50c4922fe53a..bd96f0457ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1981,9 +1981,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
-		value = !value;
-
-	return value;
+		return !value;
+	else
+		return !!value;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_value);
 
@@ -2224,9 +2224,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
-		value = !value;
-
-	return value;
+		return !value;
+	else
+		return !!value;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_value_cansleep);
 
-- 
2.6.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: return 0 or 1 in gpiod_get_value*() functions
  2015-11-30 17:30 ` Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  (?)
@ 2015-11-30 20:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2015-11-30 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot,
	hector.palacios

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
<Jose.DiazdeGrenudePedro@digi.com> wrote:
> Commit 79a9becda894 moved the awareness of active low state
> into the gpiod_get_value*() functions, but it only inverts the
> GPIO's raw value when it is active low. If the GPIO is active
> high, the gpiod_get_value*() functions return the raw value of
> the register, which can be any positive value.
>
> This patch does a double inversion when the GPIO is active high
> to make sure either 0 or 1 is returned by these functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro <Jose.DiazdeGrenudePedro@digi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
> ---
> change in v2:
>  - add missing semicolon
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 50c4922fe53a..bd96f0457ba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1981,9 +1981,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
>
>         value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
>         if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
> -               value = !value;
> -
> -       return value;
> +               return !value;
> +       else
> +               return !!value;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_value);

On linux-next (at least) _gpiod_get_raw_value() returns the following value:

value = value < 0 ? value : !!value;

So this should already be negative errno, 0 or 1.

Regards,
Bjorn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: return 0 or 1 in gpiod_get_value*() functions
  2015-11-30 17:30 ` Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2015-12-10 16:54 ` Linus Walleij
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-12-10 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Alexandre Courbot, Hector Palacios

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
<Jose.DiazdeGrenudePedro@digi.com> wrote:

> Commit 79a9becda894 moved the awareness of active low state
> into the gpiod_get_value*() functions, but it only inverts the
> GPIO's raw value when it is active low. If the GPIO is active
> high, the gpiod_get_value*() functions return the raw value of
> the register, which can be any positive value.

No, because:

static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
        struct gpio_chip        *chip;
        int offset;
        int value;

        chip = desc->chip;
        offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
        value = chip->get ? chip->get(chip, offset) : -EIO;
        value = value < 0 ? value : !!value;
        trace_gpio_value(desc_to_gpio(desc), 1, value);
        return value;
}

This returns a negative error code or the value clamped to [0,1]

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-10 16:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-30 17:30 [PATCH v2] gpiolib: return 0 or 1 in gpiod_get_value*() functions Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
2015-11-30 17:30 ` Jose Diaz de Grenu de Pedro
2015-11-30 20:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-10 16:54 ` Linus Walleij

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.