From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755456AbbLAAnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:43:31 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:42899 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754314AbbLAAn3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:43:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1448930594.30642.1.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32 00/38] 2.6.32.69-longterm review From: Ben Hutchings To: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:43:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0s3ICDD+LOcdDVu96Yxg" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.247 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-0s3ICDD+LOcdDVu96Yxg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 17:04 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Here comes 2.6.32.69-rc2. >=20 > It adds or replaces the following patches on top of -rc1 that were needed > or incorrectly backported as spotted by Ben : >=20 > =C2=A0 Chris Wright (1): > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0security: add cred argument to securi= ty_capable() >=20 > =C2=A0 Eric W. Biederman (1): > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0vfs: Test for and handle paths that a= re unreachable from their mnt_root >=20 > =C2=A0 Konstantin Khlebnikov (1): > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0pagemap: hide physical addresses from= non-privileged users >=20 > These patches will be posted as a response to this one (with 39 and 40 be= ing > the extra ones). If anyone has any issue with these being applied, please= let > me know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to = add > a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. If anyone thi= nks > some important patches are missing and should be added prior to the relea= se, > please report them quickly with their respective mainline commit IDs. >=20 > Last response delay remains unchanged : Sat Dec=C2=A0=C2=A05 22:47:02 CET= 2015. >=20 > The updated patch series can be found in one patch at : > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/lo= ngterm-review/patch-2.6.32.69-rc2.gz I've applied this to the Debian 6.0 kernel source, and all looks good. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice. - John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers --=-0s3ICDD+LOcdDVu96Yxg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUAVlztIue/yOyVhhEJAQqcZBAAyACAdU8WF2arGWWFWm2odZ851ScGlPWE n2SxzYcA9jQ27lKGiz5O2mlFXtBzJeNMs5R2DipZ/Y8XyFZql+I9KRErvcolBgRZ NxqGzcR8IeWDKJcWbWwdmakY0aGXKEW49CmZFhWbuxUW+lF4UCYlTaHJZGIIwvW4 +4ElexK8uoN5O64Qa80eE+2og72uZpDPON7eAwvZHLz2iqSO0GAcL9IsNklNoRBu +teadRudtcdzlFO0EJOnoMD0J8zkSjM6N4uc+/seh7J3vcjEhVHltVr1Y8W0zN7o 2ZYslP7RVmMadfkAXhKwCeJUjEWhxtQaCdLLW9hWcTpbqOxHU8zNnthhfaJTO6IC JxuDMqz817wy4vSOlIfl21d4Vci713XEzMqOrWahp34FyopBQ7iKxh0mgaT8wkNs KYniP/upZmVkSYF7vV4TNqLfIvqv6BWIOOGEUi1GY2OkEGWmNZ4r6Aro2YkV00oG pz498bkJl+Upi9VFFCcfP/+h7kJdBTTISekHFcS2BQkV+7n2jwZbOBtIKW2JMBNz VRgbe83J66S+eY0H49u1uwcQyGAAQz1QBJ55hCCdGhRewwHYFYFjnev/cdHyOjHY B0YsWRMKNoFrJqnn3oICU+4i+hlFcFo5ngK6KA/DjlNZD/an0xuHgmuPRBeXHQcL eQRv1w6tMmU= =6MZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0s3ICDD+LOcdDVu96Yxg--