From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E353660124 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioir85 with SMTP id r85so191369877ioi.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:02:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6WvSpwOf1icBbNGW4uXhgc3gbdz3KMafIXmM2ZH3p8=; b=DuI6Ve6f2Rf9tW01+en1z72EWe7LRoWt74UeZd0Fza7Y5rqzsi5hmSwFgiFItzzSIN l57ZdQzgKyRYm2kosKhMU3av51Tv3g5Byvt9PnZXiRj+h/9nPLntqEgVcstt8Gl8O3JZ oJESYzuUW5BeMif4chS5rGRksWHuonLhebO78J4T+ADvTzfNkga9Ke8/zy33vOiQjN5e fJ4kAmnlSonp2K9ug5+Saf0nxio469B9UKzFQaPUXK6i7tM+FQefE417ogJDmVhssICP COejpNVRLwFnQOsXSSU6qL/D7SxR1vpOgLUAFe89ToOMSNeO0un2+2GPgwTuemqEBp0z MwnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6WvSpwOf1icBbNGW4uXhgc3gbdz3KMafIXmM2ZH3p8=; b=JYmi2OADVveyMs31LfdMWV2t5moha4JdkNMVDQAUjkbu9wibuRPpiz9LygtsiU6CYV HPnIux9mbOSdPvQ5k0NYkbu6vpflRkizUbvJKow1qRSNxX6txUgE+OKUppwYp7G8mMe7 6BKrgDkJnDfEGZw89nGv5QYNpvF/WFo0G3xfYyLRrBEOEUlLZaqP1m/47/OIRezNpTTQ SnwwmbQY+7djZmy7VYX+w4El/s17DrCCcwx2pB8BTErelu8pa7Is7L0hTxu2kNTBtw9g cEmRiYoLe3FIhYbo2VQvORj0zkCUDH+SWeheCg1nZmDarVBYIdvyr4u83bW9ehzOwqYw Z4/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBcZhHj0SLLq6wBQcChyfIbrJuislgYA2XB/hlN72Ttj4z3bFSsy/Im6ceaTwyWaqOkXCL X-Received: by 10.107.159.199 with SMTP id i190mr25204097ioe.29.1449514962361; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DEE2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.222.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i69sm10267008iod.27.2015.12.07.11.02.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:02:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1449514958.30674.37.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Andrew Shadura Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:02:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dbus: build with systemd support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:02:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 15:38 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > It's good to have the extra functionality, such as seat support > provided with systemd support. Not least of all to support > systemd user-sessions. Your patch is against D-Bus 1.10.2, which is not yet in OE-core master. I adapted the patch to the current D-Bus 1.8.20, but there the advantages turned out to be (IMHO) fairly minor: it only adds logging via journald. socket activation via systemd already works even without --enable-systemd, because the recipe explicitly installs the systemd unit files and the code itself supports it also without --enable-systemd. But I like your patches, so perhaps including D-Bus 1.10.x (1.10.6 is the latest stable release) can be considered for the next OE-core release? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.