From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <1449770155.8579.2.camel@gmail.com> From: Daniel Micay Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:55:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20151209172101.GA70633@davidb.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-39DZ/bcQmU0R2rkEzKhR" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Self Introduction To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: Catalin Marinas List-ID: --=-39DZ/bcQmU0R2rkEzKhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > ARMv8 64-bit: ?? The worst case scenario would be doing something like the x86_64 UDEREF. > x86 pre-late-Broadwell: nothing upstream (though UDEREF in PaX exists) It's worth noting that there's the pre-PCID implementation (slow and vulnerable to races) and then two choices of better implementations when PCID is available. You probably know that already, but it's not obvious to everyone else. --=-39DZ/bcQmU0R2rkEzKhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJWabyrAAoJEPnnEuWa9fIq/h4P/R5+wl+zDLjEVpUQ9u/vi3K+ S3a7Tnzxn7o7z27kOkW1suqfRz43PV5fOGjSZdtoLxJ1RrihtwI9vzwtGqox0cV5 nQVwNH0XyVG70e11vGCZ3mZrwOqU/cEa+0SznLTxUpdvaAFdG/nnhAWGORARtiLz K7GC2Cr6twAxv559awLZ0Rb+q+3k2uoysqzbyu9rQF0hWS0LxKg/eCq1yvUKO/Xr Ohku5mFByxl3T8EFFO5PfhJxmZZjV3R0piu6Oe+HXPE+ayNhqf4DQKN1R4ng8Kmu dvRAeucM4sGpG5C0d6+WseOyNxB6gRbdFMSDfYVEyhzqIt/wLlgwn7HPS1m3uEEu PrVBql81olJaUO8TqoMuSf3yfYhM9oqDdxX6sH/sUsHSO45rgRPawIsA2YCKX5xW Fg/Wk02pK/+IaFXWxFb6aaiZhW/0REPC1G8yVMT6GezsvXzAV7/gb2Vbhbd061EQ 6u2gBVNzG1BJouFvp+/HlQhwb8RqoCJwbcZuyQOPgkdguwTBweJWvx/QDkdmH6Yr pF3LoIv9j+oCUwcX6v37relX/d+yvTWOYNEnsSyyNiEJq8YJEFD4CxXXxgDH/ajZ w8LRx4B4df8904+ljvSmG6iRP3oCouPJZuEeVLSPC2ToebXTeEOpN6H1aXtBBiDu FIkFunzGdX373QxqLCF0 =crTT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-39DZ/bcQmU0R2rkEzKhR--