From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support. Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:32:59 -0600 Message-ID: <1450135979.15946.406.camel@freescale.com> References: <1444822498-16477-1-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <1444822498-16477-6-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org> <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com> <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Zhiqiang Hou , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com, Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com, bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com, leoli@freescale.com, wsa@the-dreams.de, wim@iguana.be, corbet@lwn.net, mturquette@baylibre.com, Wenbin.Song@freescale.com, Russell King List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 12:54 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/14, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > --- > > > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > > > > Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no > > > > objections)? Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's > > > > changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and > > > > clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no > > > > response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good > > > > for v3. > > > > > > Done. The consumer APIs look ok too, but I'd like to see if > Russell has any comments. I've pinged Russell several times and gotten no response -- how should we proceed? -Scott From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1on0114.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.114]:19318 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605AbbLNXdM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:33:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1450135979.15946.406.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support. From: Scott Wood To: Stephen Boyd CC: Zhiqiang Hou , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Russell King Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:32:59 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> References: <1444822498-16477-1-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <1444822498-16477-6-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org> <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com> <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 12:54 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/14, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > --- > > > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > > > > Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no > > > > objections)? Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's > > > > changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and > > > > clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no > > > > response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good > > > > for v3. > > > > > > Done. The consumer APIs look ok too, but I'd like to see if > Russell has any comments. I've pinged Russell several times and gotten no response -- how should we proceed? -Scott From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: scottwood@freescale.com (Scott Wood) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:32:59 -0600 Subject: [PATCH V3 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support. In-Reply-To: <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> References: <1444822498-16477-1-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <1444822498-16477-6-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org> <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com> <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1450135979.15946.406.camel@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 12:54 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/14, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > --- > > > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > > > > Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no > > > > objections)? Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's > > > > changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and > > > > clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no > > > > response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good > > > > for v3. > > > > > > Done. The consumer APIs look ok too, but I'd like to see if > Russell has any comments. I've pinged Russell several times and gotten no response -- how should we proceed? -Scott