All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ktkhai@parallels.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
	pang.xunlei@linaro.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH for v3.18.25 3/6] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
Date: Tue,  5 Jan 2016 18:24:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451985898-23089-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451985898-23089-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

In order to be able to use pull_rt_task() from a callback, we need to
do away with the return value.

Since the return value indicates if we should reschedule, do this
inside the function. Since not all callers currently do this, this can
increase the number of reschedules due rt balancing.

Too many reschedules is not a correctness issues, too few are.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.679002000@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>

Conflicts:
	kernel/sched/rt.c
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 5a91237..ce807aa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
-static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
+static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
 
 static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
@@ -399,9 +399,8 @@ static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
+static inline void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1757,14 +1756,15 @@ static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
 		;
 }
 
-static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
+static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
-	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu, ret = 0, cpu;
+	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu, cpu;
+	bool resched = false;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 	struct rq *src_rq;
 
 	if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * Match the barrier from rt_set_overloaded; this guarantees that if we
@@ -1821,7 +1821,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 			if (p->prio < src_rq->curr->prio)
 				goto skip;
 
-			ret = 1;
+			resched = true;
 
 			deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
 			set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
@@ -1837,7 +1837,8 @@ skip:
 		double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	if (resched)
+		resched_curr(this_rq);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1933,8 +1934,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	if (!p->on_rq || rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
 		return;
 
-	if (pull_rt_task(rq))
-		resched_curr(rq);
+	pull_rt_task(rq);
 }
 
 void __init init_sched_rt_class(void)
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  8:52 [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12  8:47   ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-12 10:21   ` Willy Tarreau
2016-01-25  7:25   ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16  7:08     ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16  8:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16 17:42         ` Greg KH
2016-02-17  0:11           ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17  0:41             ` Greg KH
2016-02-17  2:00               ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17  3:01                 ` Greg KH
2016-02-17  3:02                 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-23 21:05                   ` Ben Hutchings
2016-02-23 21:06                   ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-05  9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 1/7] sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 2/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 5/7] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 7/7] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 1/6] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 2/6] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 4/6] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 5/6] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 6/6] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-03-01  8:15 ` [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Greg KH
2016-07-18  6:31   ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-18 12:09     ` Greg KH
2016-07-18 23:59       ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-13 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1451985898-23089-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.