From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/31] xen/x86: Store antifeatures inverted in a featureset Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1452003557.13361.280.camel@citrix.com> References: <1450301073-28191-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1450301073-28191-4-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <5679893002000078000C25CE@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <56798246.5050804@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56798246.5050804@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 17:03 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 22/12/15 16:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > On 16.12.15 at 22:24, wrote: > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid/cpuid-private.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > > > +#ifdef __XEN__ > > > + > > > +#include > > > + > > > +#include > > > + > > > +#else > > > + > > > +# error TODO for userspace > > I suppose your intentions with this will become apparent in later > > patches? > > Everything in xen/arch/x86/cpuid/ is shared code between Xen and libxc, > to avoid having different algorithms/structures between the hypervisor > and toolstack. I took the question to be "does a later patch in this series remove the #error?". Ian.