From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com>
Cc: "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@holtmann.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@endlessm.com>,
linux@endlessm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] rfkill: Remove obsolete "state" sysfs interface
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:44:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453236291.25499.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+A7VXVOYY4vzYupsoG0A9kinBvRhrD3_MP2DByR5v+5gGYuyA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20160119_213710_142942_A54A4B35)
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 15:36 -0500, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
>
> > I suspect that nevertheless, we can't just remove it - Googling
> > around shows quite a bit of (e.g. Android) code using it.
> >
>
> Should I update the expected removal date to 2018, or some other time
> in the future? Or if this is not going to be removed at all,
> shouldn't it be moved back to stable?
>
Yeah, maybe we should just move it back. The problem with it is that it
doesn't fully reflect the state (both sw+hw blocked can't be reflected)
but if the current users are happy with it then that's not really a
problem.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-19 15:42 [PATCH 0/8] General RFKill improvements João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] rfkill: Documentation and style fixes João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:11 ` Johannes Berg
2016-01-19 20:11 ` Johannes Berg
2016-01-19 20:19 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:19 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] rfkill: Improve code readability João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] " João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] rfkill: Remove obsolete "claim" sysfs interface João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] rfkill: Remove obsolete "state" " João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:15 ` Johannes Berg
2016-01-19 20:36 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:36 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:44 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 6/8] rfkill: Move user_state_from_blocked() close to its user João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 7/8] rfkill: Update userspace API documentation João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] rfkill: Factor common code João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 15:42 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 17:39 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-19 17:39 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-19 20:32 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 20:32 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2016-01-19 18:15 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-26 13:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] General RFKill improvements Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453236291.25499.0.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jprvita@endlessm.com \
--cc=jprvita@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessm.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.