From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMcU3-0000Ig-Vk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:14:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMcTz-0000W9-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:14:39 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:22478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMcTy-0000Vx-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:14:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1453472072.4320.91.camel@citrix.com> From: Ian Campbell Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:14:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1452864168.32341.97.camel@citrix.com> References: <1452864168.32341.97.camel@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Minios-devel] [PATCH v8 0/] Begin to disentangle libxenctrl and provide some stable libraries List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xen-devel Cc: Wei Liu , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, minios-devel@lists.xenproject.org, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, Roger Pau Monne On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 13:22 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > In <1431963008.4944.80.camel@citrix.com> I proposed stabilising some > parts of the libxenctrl API/ABI by disaggregating into separate > libraries. >=20 > This is v8 of that set of series against: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0xen > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0qemu-xen > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0qemu-xen-traditional > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0mini-os I have now applied all xen, qemu-xen-traditional and mini-os, with the one patch updated to v9 in the xen series (posted earlier today). I omitted the final two patches from the Xen side: [28/29] tools/libs/*: Introduce APIs to restrict handles to a specific doma= in. [29/29] HACK: Update Config.mk to pull all the right bits from my xenbits t= rees #28 isn't quite ready/agreed yet. (I hope #29 is obvious...) Stefano, you can go ahead with the qemu-xen part whenever. Maybe it would be worth waiting for the xen push gate to succeed first though? At least waiting for a xen-unstable-smoke flight would be wise. Ian, you weren't around to discuss the qemu-xen-traditional push with, but I took a gamble that you would be ok with me doing so on this occasion. I hope that's ok. I modified the 4 patches with=C2=A0updated MINIOS_UPSTREAM_REVISION and QEMU_TRADITIONAL_REVISION where called for. Ian.