From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toshi Kani Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Enhance iomem search interfaces and support EINJ to NVDIMM Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:34:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1453757661.834.99.camel__42799.7203697034$1453757808$gmane$org@hpe.com> References: <1452020068-26492-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20160125191804.GE14030@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aNonC-0003Or-H9 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:35:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160125191804.GE14030@pd.tnic> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dyoung@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 20:18 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:54:28AM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote: > > This patch-set enhances the iomem table and its search interfacs, and > > then changes EINJ to support NVDIMM. > > : > > Ok, all applied ontop of 4.5-rc1. > > You could take a look if everything's still fine and I haven't botched > anything: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=tip-mm I verified the patches and tested the kernel in the tree. All look good. > I'll let the build bot chew on it and then test it here and send it out > again to everyone on CC so that people don't act surprised. Sounds great. > Thanks for this cleanup, code looks much better now! Thanks! -Toshi