From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934552AbcA1Oqz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:46:55 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f66.google.com ([209.85.220.66]:35138 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932685AbcA1Oqw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:46:52 -0500
Message-ID: <1453992410.7627.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] net: add rx_unhandled stat counter
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:46:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: <1453992265.7627.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
References: <1453489882-57948-1-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com>
	 <1453926098-40181-1-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com>
	 <1453928987.20722.29.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <20160128060215.GB59058@redhat.com> <20160128061808.GD59058@redhat.com>
	 <1453986002.7627.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <20160128143806.GE59058@redhat.com>
	 <1453992162.7627.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1453992265.7627.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 06:44 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 06:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Sure, you also can set stats64->rx_unhandled to 0 here, just to be 100%
> > safe.
> 
> And not add the memset(stats64, 0, sizeof(*stats64)), since we have the
> guarantee to properly init whole stats64 structure.

Or a more tricky

memset((char *)stats64 + sizeof(struct net_device_stats),
       0,
       sizeof(*stats64) - sizeof(struct net_device_stats));