From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757199AbcBCWfd (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:35:33 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:46591 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757021AbcBCWfP (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:35:15 -0500 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Andrew Elble , Trond Myklebust , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 051/180] nfs: Fix race in __update_open_stateid() Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:30:57 +0000 Message-Id: <1454538786-12215-52-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <1454538786-12215-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1454538786-12215-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.7-ckt24 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From: Andrew Elble commit 361cad3c89070aeb37560860ea8bfc092d545adc upstream. We've seen this in a packet capture - I've intermixed what I think was going on. The fix here is to grab the so_lock sooner. 1964379 -> #1 open (for write) reply seqid=1 1964393 -> #2 open (for read) reply seqid=2 __nfs4_close(), state->n_wronly-- nfs4_state_set_mode_locked(), changes state->state = [R] state->flags is [RW] state->state is [R], state->n_wronly == 0, state->n_rdonly == 1 1964398 -> #3 open (for write) call -> because close is already running 1964399 -> downgrade (to read) call seqid=2 (close of #1) 1964402 -> #3 open (for write) reply seqid=3 __update_open_stateid() nfs_set_open_stateid_locked(), changes state->flags state->flags is [RW] state->state is [R], state->n_wronly == 0, state->n_rdonly == 1 new sequence number is exposed now via nfs4_stateid_copy() next step would be update_open_stateflags(), pending so_lock 1964403 -> downgrade reply seqid=2, fails with OLD_STATEID (close of #1) nfs4_close_prepare() gets so_lock and recalcs flags -> send close 1964405 -> downgrade (to read) call seqid=3 (close of #1 retry) __update_open_stateid() gets so_lock * update_open_stateflags() updates state->n_wronly. nfs4_state_set_mode_locked() updates state->state state->flags is [RW] state->state is [RW], state->n_wronly == 1, state->n_rdonly == 1 * should have suppressed the preceding nfs4_close_prepare() from sending open_downgrade 1964406 -> write call 1964408 -> downgrade (to read) reply seqid=4 (close of #1 retry) nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked() state->flags is [R] state->state is [RW], state->n_wronly == 1, state->n_rdonly == 1 1964409 -> write reply (fails, openmode) Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 2dfd374a89f5..cdbc0599664d 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ static void __update_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *open_s * Protect the call to nfs4_state_set_mode_locked and * serialise the stateid update */ + spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock); write_seqlock(&state->seqlock); if (deleg_stateid != NULL) { nfs4_stateid_copy(&state->stateid, deleg_stateid); @@ -1230,7 +1231,6 @@ static void __update_open_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state, nfs4_stateid *open_s if (open_stateid != NULL) nfs_set_open_stateid_locked(state, open_stateid, fmode); write_sequnlock(&state->seqlock); - spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock); update_open_stateflags(state, fmode); spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock); }