From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <corsac@debian.org>
Received: from molly.corsac.net (pic75-3-78-194-244-226.fbxo.proxad.net
 [78.194.244.226])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Thu,  4 Feb 2016 17:29:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1454603376.4241.5.camel@debian.org>
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:29:36 +0100
In-Reply-To: <56B20C05.7080307@gmail.com>
References: <CAFnMBaRfu93jkgmZ_vLDChF7Uv-dCE6dNN6YkSxU3EFvn8iHtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56B20C05.7080307@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-28DV4sKVyaWmpG+9SIna"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] The future of disk encryption with LUKS2
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>, ".. ink .." <mhogomchungu@gmail.com>, "dm-crypt@saout.de" <dm-crypt@saout.de>


--=-28DV4sKVyaWmpG+9SIna
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On mer., 2016-02-03 at 15:17 +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> Anyway, please give me few weeks, I expect the design discussion will hap=
pen here
> (I have a lot of to say why I am trying to do it this way.)
> I just prefer to discuss existing proof-of-concept code that theoretic di=
scussions.
>=20
> For now, LUKS2 is experiment (partially proof-of-concept of some ideas
> of configurable keyslots, partially as testbed for my university work
> as implementing Argon 2 as PBKDF2 replacement etc).

I know it's a recurring subject, and maybe it's more dm-crypt2 than LUKS2 o=
r
something, but in that context, is there people working on authenticated
encryption and anti-replay?

Regards,
--=20
Yves-Alexis


--=-28DV4sKVyaWmpG+9SIna
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAABCAAGBQJWs3xwAAoJEG3bU/KmdcCle4sH/R3fc5ONAbuBtEqsV2hjj4xg
OeG0NQ8rdaKkPanTDUPIAFZ8K5pn+1b1f7WbCWRY50J2jncqJNfRlmiSQzOo6F85
PqH9pU55pvCkY92/grNQGQ4gAx4t3KxCbWkg99+hZvTtkeoC+ClWdMQJVgolZ5lG
eGVUCaitYhC04nPtF1R5L89xXScgz9l3WloS5FxA2bMn9ECe4W4aI8cu329hh8MQ
pd+p5/Es3wo1eI1SRVMhbY7bKtI8p+1uYYCUrGgCxYL7PALQr54UDH/QTAgNHV6+
kDLZgyvd96wkzQaB+sMa20vse9cn1+QgR5Ho3t+E2bHU5k0LQMwSrjW2qhND7Wo=
=g/0o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-28DV4sKVyaWmpG+9SIna--