From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D662133 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u19LUt3o007342; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:30:55 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mHQLopBohQqL; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:30:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u19LUpGQ007337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:30:53 GMT Message-ID: <1455053451.16142.84.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Peter Seebach , Mark Hatle Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:30:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160209151635.6327ebb0@seebs-worktop> References: <56BA47DD.6020007@windriver.com> <20160209151635.6327ebb0@seebs-worktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pseudo 1.7.5 [jethro][fido] X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:30:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:16 -0600, Peter Seebach wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:11:09 -0600 > Mark Hatle wrote: > > > Everything remains compatible, but it does fix a subtle race > > condition that can > > lead to files under pseudo control inheriting their host system > > permissions. > > > > See bug 9031 for more details. > > For reference, the thing which exposed the circumstance where this > was > actually remotely likely to come up was added in f1d4744, back in > 2014, > and somehow the actual change isn't mentioned in ChangeLog.txt, but > in > practice it's been there since 1.6.1. But it would only (probably) > show > up if you ran some commands with "pseudo " *while* running other > things using a pseudo server normally. Which we do as standard if you enable buildhistory. (for full disclosure of the issue) Cheers, Richard