From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ewan Milne Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Setting scsi host template to indicate that fnic does not support multiqueue Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:16:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1457986577.4188.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1457979262-26571-1-git-send-email-satishkh@cisco.com> <1457979262-26571-4-git-send-email-satishkh@cisco.com> Reply-To: emilne@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49931 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753187AbcCNUQS (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:16:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1457979262-26571-4-git-send-email-satishkh@cisco.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Satish Kharat Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 11:14 -0700, Satish Kharat wrote: > Fnic does not support mutiqueue. Setting the scsi_host_template in > fnic_host_template to indicate that. > > Changing fnic_version from 1.6.0.21 to 1.6.0.22 > > Signed-off-by: Satish Kharat > --- > drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h > index 9ddc920..35264c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ > > #define DRV_NAME "fnic" > #define DRV_DESCRIPTION "Cisco FCoE HBA Driver" > -#define DRV_VERSION "1.6.0.21" > +#define DRV_VERSION "1.6.0.22" > #define PFX DRV_NAME ": " > #define DFX DRV_NAME "%d: " > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c > index 58ce902..fa8a121 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template fnic_host_template = { > .max_sectors = 0xffff, > .shost_attrs = fnic_attrs, > .track_queue_depth = 1, > + .disable_blk_mq = 1, > }; > > static void Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne