From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB9062136 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2TBxI1Q020638; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:59:18 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i5sVe0iDSyT0; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:59:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2TBxFf2020634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:59:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1459252755.21672.21.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:59:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3148e125ec883b341b1bbbc8bb3f8845bde01eb2.1459238263.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> References: <3148e125ec883b341b1bbbc8bb3f8845bde01eb2.1459238263.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] image-live.bbclass/image-vm.bbclass: remove duplicated code X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:59:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 00:59 -0700, Robert Yang wrote: > Move the common code to image.bbclass and remove duplicated ones. Whilst I do like the idea of this patch set, I don't like generic functions called "populate", or adding EFI variables to image.bbclass itself. I believe that some refactoring does make a lot of sense here but this doesn't look right. The diffstats don't seem to suggest a large volume of common code either (as yet). Cheers, Richard