From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] mlx4: add support for fast rx drop bpf program Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 20:40:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1459622455.18188.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1459560118-5582-1-git-send-email-bblanco@plumgrid.com> <1459560118-5582-5-git-send-email-bblanco@plumgrid.com> (sfid-20160402_032226_544590_102A25B3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, gerlitz@mellanox.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com To: Brenden Blanco , davem@davemloft.net Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:58723 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbcDBSlB (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:41:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1459560118-5582-5-git-send-email-bblanco@plumgrid.com> (sfid-20160402_032226_544590_102A25B3) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 18:21 -0700, Brenden Blanco wrote: > +static int mlx4_bpf_set(struct net_device *dev, int fd) > +{ [...] > + if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_PHYS_DEV) { > + bpf_prog_put(prog); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } Why wouldn't this check be done in the generic code that calls ndo_bpf_set()? johannes