All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <eric.vanhensbergen@linux.dev>
To: "Joakim Sindholt" <opensource@zhasha.com>, v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "Joakim Sindholt" <opensource@zhasha.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] fs/9p: drop inodes immediately on non-.L too
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:08:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <145fc52b2452095c44260825670141d0d3b42c7d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318112542.18863-3-opensource@zhasha.com>

Slowly parsing through these, thanks for the fixes.
This one has a bit of a problem in that we don't have a v9fs specific
drop_inode anymore (either in legacy or .L). The release of the fid should 
be handled by v9fs_dir_release in both versions of the protocol. 

I had convinced myself we could just use generic_drop_inode because we 
decoupled clunking fids from the dentry/inode structures and just handled
them directly in v9fs_dir_release -- so really by recovering the inode 
structure every time we were just forcing churn in the inode alloc/dealloc
routines that seemed unnecessary (even in the uncached mode).

Was your concern the performance of the client side lookup of the inode
based on qid or the server side based on fid and can you give me a bit
more information on what you are seeing?  Are you not seeing fid clunks
for certain conditions (ie. transient fids, etc.)?

    -eric


March 18, 2024 at 6:22 AM, "Joakim Sindholt" <opensource@zhasha.com> wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Sindholt <opensource@zhasha.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  fs/9p/vfs_super.c | 1 +
> 
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
> 
> index 941f7d0e0bfa..23cc67f29af2 100644
> 
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
> 
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
> 
> @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static const struct super_operations v9fs_super_ops = {
> 
>  .alloc_inode = v9fs_alloc_inode,
> 
>  .free_inode = v9fs_free_inode,
> 
>  .statfs = simple_statfs,
> 
> + .drop_inode = v9fs_drop_inode,
> 
>  .evict_inode = v9fs_evict_inode,
> 
>  .show_options = v9fs_show_options,
> 
>  .umount_begin = v9fs_umount_begin,
> 
> -- 
> 
> 2.43.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-28 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18 11:22 Bugfixes for plain 9P2000 Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-18 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fs/9p: only translate RWX permissions " Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-18 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] fs/9p: drop inodes immediately on non-.L too Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-28 15:08   ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2024-03-28 15:17     ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2024-03-28 15:37     ` Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-28 19:47       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2024-03-28 20:03         ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2024-03-30  6:47           ` Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-18 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] fs/9p: translate O_TRUNC into OTRUNC Joakim Sindholt
2024-03-18 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] fs/9p: fix the cache always being enabled on files with qid flags Joakim Sindholt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=145fc52b2452095c44260825670141d0d3b42c7d@linux.dev \
    --to=eric.vanhensbergen@linux.dev \
    --cc=opensource@zhasha.com \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.