From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756552AbcDNOVv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:21:51 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:10774 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755357AbcDNOVt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:21:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,485,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="784862484" From: Matthew Wilcox To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Cc: Ross Zwisler , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov , Kirill Shutemov , Jan Kara , Neil Brown , Matthew Wilcox Subject: [PATCH v2 20/29] radix tree test suite: multi-order iteration test Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:16:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1460643410-30196-21-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.0.rc3 In-Reply-To: <1460643410-30196-1-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> References: <1460643410-30196-1-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ross Zwisler Add a unit test to verify that we can iterate over multi-order entries properly via a radix_tree_for_each_slot() loop. This was done with a single, somewhat complicated configuration that was meant to test many of the various corner cases having to do with multi-order entries: - An iteration could begin at a sibling entry, and we need to return the canonical entry. - We could have entries of various orders in the same slots[] array. - We could have multi-order entries at a nonzero height, followed by indirect pointers to more radix tree nodes later in that same slots[] array. Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox --- tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c index 0a311a5..ba27fe0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c @@ -92,6 +92,96 @@ static void multiorder_insert_bug(void) item_kill_tree(&tree); } +void multiorder_iteration(void) +{ + RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void **slot; + int i, err; + + printf("Multiorder iteration test\n"); + +#define NUM_ENTRIES 11 + int index[NUM_ENTRIES] = {0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 34, 36, 64, 72, 128}; + int order[NUM_ENTRIES] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 0, 1, 3, 0, 7}; + + for (i = 0; i < NUM_ENTRIES; i++) { + err = item_insert_order(&tree, index[i], order[i]); + assert(!err); + } + + i = 0; + /* start from index 1 to verify we find the multi-order entry at 0 */ + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 1) { + int height = order[i] / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + int shift = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + + assert(iter.index == index[i]); + assert(iter.shift == shift); + i++; + } + + /* + * Now iterate through the tree starting at an elevated multi-order + * entry, beginning at an index in the middle of the range. + */ + i = 8; + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 70) { + int height = order[i] / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + int shift = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + + assert(iter.index == index[i]); + assert(iter.shift == shift); + i++; + } + + item_kill_tree(&tree); +} + +void multiorder_tagged_iteration(void) +{ + RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void **slot; + int i; + + printf("Multiorder tagged iteration test\n"); + +#define MT_NUM_ENTRIES 9 + int index[MT_NUM_ENTRIES] = {0, 2, 4, 16, 32, 40, 64, 72, 128}; + int order[MT_NUM_ENTRIES] = {1, 0, 2, 4, 3, 1, 3, 0, 7}; + +#define TAG_ENTRIES 7 + int tag_index[TAG_ENTRIES] = {0, 4, 16, 40, 64, 72, 128}; + + for (i = 0; i < MT_NUM_ENTRIES; i++) + assert(!item_insert_order(&tree, index[i], order[i])); + + assert(!radix_tree_tagged(&tree, 1)); + + for (i = 0; i < TAG_ENTRIES; i++) + assert(radix_tree_tag_set(&tree, tag_index[i], 1)); + + i = 0; + /* start from index 1 to verify we find the multi-order entry at 0 */ + radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &tree, &iter, 1, 1) { + assert(iter.index == tag_index[i]); + i++; + } + + /* + * Now iterate through the tree starting at an elevated multi-order + * entry, beginning at an index in the middle of the range. + */ + i = 4; + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 70) { + assert(iter.index == tag_index[i]); + i++; + } + + item_kill_tree(&tree); +} + void multiorder_checks(void) { int i; @@ -106,4 +196,6 @@ void multiorder_checks(void) multiorder_shrink((1UL << (i + RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT)), i); multiorder_insert_bug(); + multiorder_iteration(); + multiorder_tagged_iteration(); } -- 2.8.0.rc3 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Matthew Wilcox To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Cc: Ross Zwisler , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov , Kirill Shutemov , Jan Kara , Neil Brown , Matthew Wilcox Subject: [PATCH v2 20/29] radix tree test suite: multi-order iteration test Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:16:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1460643410-30196-21-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1460643410-30196-1-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> References: <1460643410-30196-1-git-send-email-willy@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: From: Ross Zwisler Add a unit test to verify that we can iterate over multi-order entries properly via a radix_tree_for_each_slot() loop. This was done with a single, somewhat complicated configuration that was meant to test many of the various corner cases having to do with multi-order entries: - An iteration could begin at a sibling entry, and we need to return the canonical entry. - We could have entries of various orders in the same slots[] array. - We could have multi-order entries at a nonzero height, followed by indirect pointers to more radix tree nodes later in that same slots[] array. Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox --- tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c index 0a311a5..ba27fe0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c @@ -92,6 +92,96 @@ static void multiorder_insert_bug(void) item_kill_tree(&tree); } +void multiorder_iteration(void) +{ + RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void **slot; + int i, err; + + printf("Multiorder iteration test\n"); + +#define NUM_ENTRIES 11 + int index[NUM_ENTRIES] = {0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 34, 36, 64, 72, 128}; + int order[NUM_ENTRIES] = {1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 0, 1, 3, 0, 7}; + + for (i = 0; i < NUM_ENTRIES; i++) { + err = item_insert_order(&tree, index[i], order[i]); + assert(!err); + } + + i = 0; + /* start from index 1 to verify we find the multi-order entry at 0 */ + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 1) { + int height = order[i] / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + int shift = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + + assert(iter.index == index[i]); + assert(iter.shift == shift); + i++; + } + + /* + * Now iterate through the tree starting at an elevated multi-order + * entry, beginning at an index in the middle of the range. + */ + i = 8; + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 70) { + int height = order[i] / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + int shift = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT; + + assert(iter.index == index[i]); + assert(iter.shift == shift); + i++; + } + + item_kill_tree(&tree); +} + +void multiorder_tagged_iteration(void) +{ + RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void **slot; + int i; + + printf("Multiorder tagged iteration test\n"); + +#define MT_NUM_ENTRIES 9 + int index[MT_NUM_ENTRIES] = {0, 2, 4, 16, 32, 40, 64, 72, 128}; + int order[MT_NUM_ENTRIES] = {1, 0, 2, 4, 3, 1, 3, 0, 7}; + +#define TAG_ENTRIES 7 + int tag_index[TAG_ENTRIES] = {0, 4, 16, 40, 64, 72, 128}; + + for (i = 0; i < MT_NUM_ENTRIES; i++) + assert(!item_insert_order(&tree, index[i], order[i])); + + assert(!radix_tree_tagged(&tree, 1)); + + for (i = 0; i < TAG_ENTRIES; i++) + assert(radix_tree_tag_set(&tree, tag_index[i], 1)); + + i = 0; + /* start from index 1 to verify we find the multi-order entry at 0 */ + radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &tree, &iter, 1, 1) { + assert(iter.index == tag_index[i]); + i++; + } + + /* + * Now iterate through the tree starting at an elevated multi-order + * entry, beginning at an index in the middle of the range. + */ + i = 4; + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, 70) { + assert(iter.index == tag_index[i]); + i++; + } + + item_kill_tree(&tree); +} + void multiorder_checks(void) { int i; @@ -106,4 +196,6 @@ void multiorder_checks(void) multiorder_shrink((1UL << (i + RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT)), i); multiorder_insert_bug(); + multiorder_iteration(); + multiorder_tagged_iteration(); } -- 2.8.0.rc3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org