Re: Next release plans?

Re: Next release plans?

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

Christophe Varoqui wrote:

> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious, are there any plans to cut a new formal release tarball in
>> the near future?
>>
>> The 0.5.0 release was done more than a year ago, and it seems like there
>> are quite a lot of bug fixes which may benefit everyone. In Ubuntu, I've
>> so far been cherry-picking patches as necessary, but it's obvious this
>> can't scale well (and that then important patches may go unnoticed).

> yes, you can expect a formal release before summer holidays.
> I still have to catch up with the patches my inbox before.

Any progress ? There are a lot of SuSE/Red Hat pending patches.

Re: Next release plans?

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 10/07/2015 04:52 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

> Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> 
>> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm curious, are there any plans to cut a new formal release tarball in
>>> the near future?
>>>
>>> The 0.5.0 release was done more than a year ago, and it seems like there
>>> are quite a lot of bug fixes which may benefit everyone. In Ubuntu, I've
>>> so far been cherry-picking patches as necessary, but it's obvious this
>>> can't scale well (and that then important patches may go unnoticed).
> 
>> yes, you can expect a formal release before summer holidays.
>> I still have to catch up with the patches my inbox before.
> 
> Any progress ? There are a lot of SuSE/Red Hat pending patches.

Christophe, how's it going?
Hannes, is there new SuSE patches for upstream?

-thanks-

Re: Next release plans?

[Christophe Varoqui]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1285 bytes --]

Hi Xose,

the version has been bumped to 0.6.0 after merging the Red Hat patchset.

Hannes has not submitted the SuSE patchset for inclusion yet, but I'll bump
the version to 0.6.1 if he does.

In the future I will update the version after each significant resync with
the distributor branches.

Best regards,
Christophe Varoqui
www.opensvc.com

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 10/07/2015 04:52 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
> > Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> >
> >> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm curious, are there any plans to cut a new formal release tarball in
> >>> the near future?
> >>>
> >>> The 0.5.0 release was done more than a year ago, and it seems like
> there
> >>> are quite a lot of bug fixes which may benefit everyone. In Ubuntu,
> I've
> >>> so far been cherry-picking patches as necessary, but it's obvious this
> >>> can't scale well (and that then important patches may go unnoticed).
> >
> >> yes, you can expect a formal release before summer holidays.
> >> I still have to catch up with the patches my inbox before.
> >
> > Any progress ? There are a lot of SuSE/Red Hat pending patches.
>
> Christophe, how's it going?
> Hannes, is there new SuSE patches for upstream?
>
> -thanks-
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1978 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

Re: Next release plans?

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/18/2016 11:42 AM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> Hi Xose,
>
> the version has been bumped to 0.6.0 after merging the Red Hat patchset.
>
> Hannes has not submitted the SuSE patchset for inclusion yet, but I'll
> bump the version to 0.6.1 if he does.
>
Hey, that's unfair. Ben's getting a major version...

But indeed. I've done a patchset, but was holding it off until Bens 
patches got merged. Just to avoid any conflict.

(Of course; it's not because I'm lazy :-)

So I'll be updating the patchset and will be posting it shortly.

Not sure if I manage this week, but next week for sure.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Re: Next release plans?

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 04/18/2016 11:42 AM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:

> the version has been bumped to 0.6.0 after merging the Red Hat patchset.

There is no tag for 0.6.0 at the git repository.
And tar file is missing at web page.

> In the future I will update the version after each significant resync with the distributor branches.

It would be good two major releases per year, aside from
sporadic _critical_ bugs free releases.


Thank you.

Re: Next release plans?

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 04/18/2016 11:42 AM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:

> Hannes has not submitted the SuSE patchset for inclusion yet, but I'll bump the version to 0.6.1 if he does.

CCed: Ritesh, Debian maintainer.

Maybe there is some pending patches for upstream at Debian.

Re: Next release plans?

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1416 bytes --]

On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 00:22 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 11:42 AM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hannes has not submitted the SuSE patchset for inclusion yet, but I'll bump
> > the version to 0.6.1 if he does.
> CCed: Ritesh, Debian maintainer.
> 
> Maybe there is some pending patches for upstream at Debian.

In Debian, we don't have much delta. The only minor (1 liner) patch I see
carrying is:

rrs@learner:~/.rrs-home/Community/Packaging/multipath-tools (master)$ cat
debian/patches/increase-kpartx-retries.patch 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-May/msg00087.html

Many users have reported that increasing the retries solves the problem

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785251
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734794
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608737
Index: multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c
===================================================================
--- multipath-tools.orig/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.235438304
+0530
+++ multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.231438251 +0530
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
 extern int 
 del_loop (const char *device)
 {
-	int retries = 3;
+	int retries = 5;
 	int fd;
 
 	if ((fd = open (device, O_RDONLY)) < 0) {

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: increase-kpartx-retries.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 726 bytes --]

https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-May/msg00087.html

Many users have reported that increasing the retries solves the problem

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785251
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734794
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608737
Index: multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c
===================================================================
--- multipath-tools.orig/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.235438304 +0530
+++ multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.231438251 +0530
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
 extern int 
 del_loop (const char *device)
 {
-	int retries = 3;
+	int retries = 5;
 	int fd;
 
 	if ((fd = open (device, O_RDONLY)) < 0) {

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

[PATCH Debian] kpartx: increase retries was Re: Next release plans?

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

On 04/19/2016 01:47 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:

> In Debian, we don't have much delta. The only minor (1 liner) patch I see
> carrying is:
> 
> rrs@learner:~/.rrs-home/Community/Packaging/multipath-tools (master)$ cat
> debian/patches/increase-kpartx-retries.patch 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-May/msg00087.html
> 
> Many users have reported that increasing the retries solves the problem
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785251
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734794
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608737
> Index: multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c
> ===================================================================
> --- multipath-tools.orig/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.235438304
> +0530
> +++ multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c	2015-10-16 21:33:27.231438251 +0530
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
>  extern int 
>  del_loop (const char *device)
>  {
> -	int retries = 3;
> +	int retries = 5;
>  	int fd;
>  
>  	if ((fd = open (device, O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
> 

This patch also was lost.

Re: [PATCH Debian] kpartx: increase retries was Re: Next release plans?

[Christophe Varoqui]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]

Merged, thanks.

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 04/19/2016 01:47 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
> > In Debian, we don't have much delta. The only minor (1 liner) patch I see
> > carrying is:
> >
> > rrs@learner:~/.rrs-home/Community/Packaging/multipath-tools (master)$
> cat
> > debian/patches/increase-kpartx-retries.patch
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-May/msg00087.html
> >
> > Many users have reported that increasing the retries solves the problem
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785251
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734794
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608737
> > Index: multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- multipath-tools.orig/kpartx/lopart.c      2015-10-16
> 21:33:27.235438304
> > +0530
> > +++ multipath-tools/kpartx/lopart.c   2015-10-16 21:33:27.231438251 +0530
> > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
> >  extern int
> >  del_loop (const char *device)
> >  {
> > -     int retries = 3;
> > +     int retries = 5;
> >       int fd;
> >
> >       if ((fd = open (device, O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
> >
>
> This patch also was lost.
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2168 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

Re: Next release plans?

[Christophe Varoqui]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 958 bytes --]

Hi,

yes, you can expect a formal release before summer holidays.
I still have to catch up with the patches my inbox before.

Best regards,
Christophe Varoqui
OpenSVC

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
mathieu.tl@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'm curious, are there any plans to cut a new formal release tarball in
> the near future?
>
> The 0.5.0 release was done more than a year ago, and it seems like there
> are quite a lot of bug fixes which may benefit everyone. In Ubuntu, I've
> so far been cherry-picking patches as necessary, but it's obvious this
> can't scale well (and that then important patches may go unnoticed).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu-tl@ubuntu.com>
> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu.tl@gmail.com
> 4096R/DC95CA5A 36E2 CF22 B077 FEFE 725C  80D3 C7DA A946 DC95 CA5A
>
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1689 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

Next release plans?

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre]

Hi!

I'm curious, are there any plans to cut a new formal release tarball in
the near future?

The 0.5.0 release was done more than a year ago, and it seems like there
are quite a lot of bug fixes which may benefit everyone. In Ubuntu, I've
so far been cherry-picking patches as necessary, but it's obvious this
can't scale well (and that then important patches may go unnoticed).

Kind regards,

-- 
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu-tl@ubuntu.com>
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu.tl@gmail.com
4096R/DC95CA5A 36E2 CF22 B077 FEFE 725C  80D3 C7DA A946 DC95 CA5A