All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:37:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461238678.20801.11.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718B244.3020201@gmail.com>

Hi Matthias,

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 12:58 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 21/04/16 12:26, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/15 19:23, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/09/15 08:45, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>> <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar
> >>>>> <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>>>> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the
> >>>>>>> patch which
> >>>>>>> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver.
> >>>>>>> So it will
> >>>>>>> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure
> >>>>>>> how this
> >>>>>>> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC
> >>>>>>> maintainer
> >>>>>>> tree?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on
> >>>>>> rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq
> >>>>>> wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>> merged by Linus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your explanation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will as soon as v4.3-rc1 shows up.
> >
> > I somehow forgot this patch. Sorry for that.
> > Applied for v4.6-next/dts64 right now.
> >
> 
> I just realized that CLK_INFRA_CA53SEL and CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL are not 
> part of the clk driver.
> 
> Pi-Cheng, can you check if they got renamed in the meanwhile? Or do we 
> need some clock driver patches that enable this clocks for the series?
> 

Thanks your notice. Unfortunately, we still have no chance let patch
with these two clock merged. The last version is [1]. This clock patch
will block cpufreq dts [2] and dynamic power dts [3]. Clock maintainer
is working on new architecture [4], hopefully we can send new clock
patch soon. After that, we will send new cpufreq and dynamic power dts.
So please ignore [2] [3] at this moment. 

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/369737.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/206
[3]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/423899.html
[4]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/418796.html

Eddie
Thanks

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:37:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461238678.20801.11.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718B244.3020201@gmail.com>

Hi Matthias,

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 12:58 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 21/04/16 12:26, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/15 19:23, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/09/15 08:45, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>> <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar
> >>>>> <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>>>> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the
> >>>>>>> patch which
> >>>>>>> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver.
> >>>>>>> So it will
> >>>>>>> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure
> >>>>>>> how this
> >>>>>>> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC
> >>>>>>> maintainer
> >>>>>>> tree?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on
> >>>>>> rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq
> >>>>>> wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>> merged by Linus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your explanation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will as soon as v4.3-rc1 shows up.
> >
> > I somehow forgot this patch. Sorry for that.
> > Applied for v4.6-next/dts64 right now.
> >
> 
> I just realized that CLK_INFRA_CA53SEL and CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL are not 
> part of the clk driver.
> 
> Pi-Cheng, can you check if they got renamed in the meanwhile? Or do we 
> need some clock driver patches that enable this clocks for the series?
> 

Thanks your notice. Unfortunately, we still have no chance let patch
with these two clock merged. The last version is [1]. This clock patch
will block cpufreq dts [2] and dynamic power dts [3]. Clock maintainer
is working on new architecture [4], hopefully we can send new clock
patch soon. After that, we will send new cpufreq and dynamic power dts.
So please ignore [2] [3] at this moment. 

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/369737.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/206
[3]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/423899.html
[4]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/418796.html

Eddie
Thanks



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eddie.huang@mediatek.com (Eddie Huang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:37:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461238678.20801.11.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718B244.3020201@gmail.com>

Hi Matthias,

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 12:58 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 21/04/16 12:26, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/15 19:23, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/09/15 08:45, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>> <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar
> >>>>> <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>>>> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the
> >>>>>>> patch which
> >>>>>>> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver.
> >>>>>>> So it will
> >>>>>>> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure
> >>>>>>> how this
> >>>>>>> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC
> >>>>>>> maintainer
> >>>>>>> tree?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on
> >>>>>> rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq
> >>>>>> wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>> merged by Linus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your explanation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will as soon as v4.3-rc1 shows up.
> >
> > I somehow forgot this patch. Sorry for that.
> > Applied for v4.6-next/dts64 right now.
> >
> 
> I just realized that CLK_INFRA_CA53SEL and CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL are not 
> part of the clk driver.
> 
> Pi-Cheng, can you check if they got renamed in the meanwhile? Or do we 
> need some clock driver patches that enable this clocks for the series?
> 

Thanks your notice. Unfortunately, we still have no chance let patch
with these two clock merged. The last version is [1]. This clock patch
will block cpufreq dts [2] and dynamic power dts [3]. Clock maintainer
is working on new architecture [4], hopefully we can send new clock
patch soon. After that, we will send new cpufreq and dynamic power dts.
So please ignore [2] [3] at this moment. 

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/369737.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/206
[3]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/423899.html
[4]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/418796.html

Eddie
Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-17  9:24 [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24 ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24 ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/3 v6] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add MT8173 CPU DVFS clock bindings Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/3 v6] cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-18 10:09   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-18 10:09     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-18 10:09     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-18 10:24     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-18 10:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-19  2:05       ` [PATCH v7 2/3] " Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-19  2:05         ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-19  5:41         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-19  5:41           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-19  5:41           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-17  9:24 ` [RESEND PATCH 3/3 v6] arm64: dts: mt8173: mt8173-evb: Add mt8173 cpufreq driver support Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-17  9:24   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-25  2:10 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-25  2:10   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-25  2:10   ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-25 23:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-25 23:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-25 23:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-26  1:25     ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-26  1:25       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-26  1:25       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-26  2:16       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-26  2:16         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-26  2:16         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-26  6:53         ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-26  6:53           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-26  6:53           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-08-28 14:06           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28 14:06             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28 14:06             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-02  6:45             ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-02  6:45               ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-02  6:45               ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-02 17:23               ` Matthias Brugger
2015-09-02 17:23                 ` Matthias Brugger
2015-09-02 17:23                 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:26                 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:26                   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:26                   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:58                   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:58                     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 10:58                     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-04-21 11:37                     ` Eddie Huang [this message]
2016-04-21 11:37                       ` Eddie Huang
2016-04-21 11:37                       ` Eddie Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461238678.20801.11.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.