From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jochen Henneberg Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:00:45 +0200 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] issue with kernel patch 2a3cdead8b408351fa1e3079b220fa331480ffbc In-Reply-To: <1768814989.41697.1461598056358.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> References: <1461577586.24438.14.camel@maxwell> <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B626501BC575@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <9B4A1B1917080E46B64F07F2989DADD65ABFD85F@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <1768814989.41697.1461598056358.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> Message-ID: <1461600045.21920.10.camel@maxwell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: Hi Aaron, On Mo, 2016-04-25 at 10:27 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote: > Jochen, > I have similar hardware to you. What PHY ID are you finding? The chip is WTI210IT from Intel, I am currently not in the office but I will provide the PHY ID tomorrow. However, the chip datasheet (http://www.intel.de/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/i210-ethernet-controller-datasheet.pdf) 8.27.3.3/8.27.3.4 says that the PHY IDs are fixed (RO), but the values read from the chip are different from what is defined in the datasheet and I wonder if this is related to the modified register read/write after the patch. However, the patch works fine with the BYT embedded network controller. Jochen > > -Aaron > -- Henneberg - Systemdesign Jochen Henneberg Loehnfeld 26 21423 Winsen (Luhe) -- Fon: +49 4174 668 773 Mobile: +49 172 160 14 69 Fax: +49 321 210 761 64 www: www.henneberg-systemdesign.com