From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1axFOc-0004Sl-Tm for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 15:04:27 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 77so47154175pfv.2 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1462201445.5535.247.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood From: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 08:04:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1462125592.5535.194.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Roman Yeryomin Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Dave Taht , ath10k On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 17:09 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > So if I run some UDP download you will just kill me? Sounds broken. > Seriously guys, I never suggesting kill a _task_ but the _flow_ Meaning dropping packets. See ? If you do not want to drop packets, do not use fq_codel and simply use bufferbloat pfifo_fast. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k